Acer Swift 5 vs MacBook Air M2 – The winner will shock you

 The latest Acer Swift 5 and the MacBook Air with M2 are both great laptops, but which one is the best? That’s the question we’ll try to answer here.

Each packs the latest Apple and Intel laptop-centric chipsets, making them two of the best laptops you can buy right now. So, which one should you buy? Let’s find out.

ACER SWIFT 5 VS MACBOOK AIR M2: PRICE AND VALUE

It’s definitely not surprising that Acer is offering more money than Apple. Of course, when you look at the lowest possible prices, the base MacBook Air M2 is $1,199, and the Acer Swift 5 is $1,549.

Considering the cost, the Acer Swift 5 comes with an Intel Core i7-1260P processor, 16GB LPDDR5 RAM, and a 1TB SSD. To get similar specs in the MacBook Air, you’ll need to shell out $1,899, because honestly, 256GB of storage isn’t enough in the base model.

ACER SWIFT 5 vs MACBOOK AIR M2: DESIGN

Apple moved decisively to make the Air look like a MacBook Pro. Gone are the sleek, stylish receding wedges that gave the Air a near-impossible size, replaced by a uniform thickness. Open the lid and you’ll see the full-size backlit keyboard at the top of the Starlight keyboard deck is slightly recessed. Directly below is a larger trackpad.

As for the Swift, Acer claims it has a “refined design,” although many OEMs tend to exaggerate with catchy buzzwords and enticing wording.

The Swift 5 measures 12.2 by 8.4 by 0.6 inches and weighs 2.7 pounds, while the MacBook Air is slightly smaller at 12 by 8.5 by 0.4 inches, but weighs the same, at 2.7 pounds.

ACER SWIFT 5 AND MACBOOK AIR M2: PORTS

The Acer Swift 5 wins handily with two Thunderbolt 4 ports, HDMI, two USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A ports, a headphone jack, and a Kensington Lock.

The M2 MacBook Air does improve slightly over its predecessor by moving charging to the dedicated MagSafe port, which leaves the two Thunderbolt 4 ports free next to the 3.5mm headphone jack.

ACER SWIFT 5 vs MACBOOK AIR M2: DISPLAY

In the Acer Swift 5 and MacBook Air, you get gorgeous, spacious screens with tiny bezels. Digging into the details will tell you exactly where Acer starts to lead slightly

The MacBook Air now has a 13.6-inch, 2560 x 1664p Liquid Retina display, compared to the previous version’s 13.3-inch. The aspect ratio is technically 3:2, but since the notch at the top forms part of the taskbar, you actually get a work area that’s closer to 16:10.

When passing our lab tests, the Air recorded a DCI-P3 color gamut of 75.9 percent and an impressive average brightness of 489 nits. In real-world use, as expected, the M2’s screen is rich in color and crisp in detail, enhanced by Apple’s proprietary TrueTone technology.

Meanwhile, the Acer Swift 5 features a 14-inch WQXGA 2560 x 1600 pixel Corning Gorilla Glass touchscreen with a 16:10 aspect ratio. The test results showed how the Acer fared in 93.3 percent of the DCI-P3 color gamut, but trailed the Air slightly at 457 nits of brightness. With numbers like these, monitors inevitably emit rich, saturated colors.

There will be people who would like the extra brightness, but in my workload the priority is always color accuracy, and the Acer gets away with it here. I can see myself working on Photoshop with ease and enjoying all kinds of vivid content, but the Swift 5 is clearly more realistic.

ACER SWIFT 5 vs MACBOOK AIR M2: PERFORMANCE

How does the laptop-centric M2 chipset stack up against similar competitors like the Intel Core i7-1260P? The answer may surprise you.

On Geekbench 5.4’s overall performance test, the Swift 5 scored a whopping 9,859, beating the average laptop average. Meanwhile, the M2 Air also performed well in our synthetic benchmarks, but fell behind in raw power, with a Geekbench score of 8,919.

The Swift 5 also leads in our HandBrake benchmark — transcoding a 4K video to 1080p in just 7 minutes 36 seconds, compared to the Air’s 7 minutes 52 seconds.

In real-world use, both systems are excellent working systems – handling multitasking with ease. But while the MacBook Air is better in the graphics department, we have to compare each system as a whole, with the Swift 5 going to be slightly faster for your productivity needs.

ACER SWIFT 5 vs MACBOOK AIR M2: BATTERY LIFE

The final round saw the M2 MacBook Air come to the fore, taking a toll on the Acer Swift 5. As you might have predicted, with Apple’s legendary laptop battery life and any system that uses its own silicon, the Air is the king of endurance.

It might be slightly shorter than the M1 MacBook Air, but at 14 hours and 6 minutes, it offers insanely long life for any commute or even a long flight. Meanwhile, the Acer Swift 5’s Laptop Mag Battery test came in pretty good at 11 hours and 24 minutes, but it clearly didn’t hold up to the Air’s prowess.

>>>>>>>>>>>>Laptop battery

2 new iOS 16 features that will literally just drain your iPhone battery

 If your iPhone keeps freezing, it’s time to make some changes. Maybe you need to charge it differently with the proper cable, or invest in a decent power bank that allows you to charge your iPhone from anywhere without relying on a wall outlet. You can also turn on Low Power Mode permanently or put iPhone in Airplane Mode to help preserve the small battery you have.

Not all battery-saving tips are obvious, though, and if you’re running iOS 16, there are some new ways to help you extend the life of your iPhone’s battery. Below, we’ll cover two new features in iOS 16 that both drain your iPhone’s battery to varying degrees, and how to turn them off to improve battery life.

Remove widgets from lock screen

All widgets on the lock screen force your app to run automatically in the background, constantly fetching data to update the information the widget displays, such as sports scores or the weather. And because of your widgets, these apps are constantly running in the background, which means they’re constantly draining battery power.

If you want to help save some battery on iOS 16, your best bet is to avoid widgets on the lock screen. The easiest way is to switch to another lock screen profile – press your finger on the existing lock screen and swipe around to select a lock screen profile without any widgets. However, if you just want to remove widgets from an existing lock screen, press on the lock screen, tap Customize, select the lock screen option, tap the widget box, and then tap the “-” button on each widget to delete them.

Keep haptic keyboard feedback off

Surprisingly, the keyboard on the iPhone has never had the ability to vibrate as you type, something recently added on iOS 16 called haptic feedback. Rather than just hearing a click, haptic feedback provides vibrations to each keystroke, providing a more immersive experience as you type. However, according to Apple, the same feature may also affect battery life.

According to this Apple support page about the keyboard, haptic feedback “may affect iPhone battery life.” There’s no specifics on how much battery life the keyboard feature consumes, but it’s best to disable this feature if you want to save battery.

Fortunately, it’s not turned on by default. If you enabled it yourself, go to Settings > Sounds & Haptics > Keyboard Feedback and turn off Haptics to turn off haptic feedback for the keyboard.

Although they haven’t been released yet, Live Activity and iCloud Shared Photo Library are two iOS 16 features that can also drain your battery, so keep an eye out for updates to this story on how to disable them.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>iPhone battery

iOS 16.1: Update your iPhone now to get these new features

 Apple is releasing iOS 16.1, the next iPhone software update, with a host of new features and some bug fixes. This includes a new way to charge your iPhone, using subscription-based Apple Fitness+ without the need for an Apple Watch, updating Dynamic Island for the iPhone 14 Pro, and more.

iOS 16.1, confirmed to launch on October 24, will also be released alongside other software updates, including iPadOS 16.1 and macOS Ventura.

So how to update to iOS 16.1?

To update, your iPhone may have an “Available Software Updates” option at the top of the settings for easy download. If not, you need to go to Settings > General > Software Update.

While iOS 16.1 fixes some bugs, this update includes some more interesting features – especially for those interested in Apple Fitness+, reducing carbon footprints, and live events. Let’s take a look below!

Apple Fitness+ is available to iPhone users

Starting October 24th, Apple Fitness+ will be available to iPhone users to subscribe, even if they don’t have an Apple Watch. It will be fully integrated with the Fitness app. Users without an Apple Watch won’t be able to see metrics like their heart rate and calories on the screen during a workout, but will still be able to follow up.

Clean and energy efficient

A new battery charging feature will be available on iPhone called Clean Energy. Available in Settings and currently only in the US, the feature will “attempt to reduce the iPhone’s carbon footprint by selectively charging low-carbon electricity when electricity is available.” This may result in slower charging, but is designed to reduce your carbon footprint.

Real-time activity of third-party applications

Want to check your sports scores or see your riding distance at a glance? iOS 16.1 brings live events to third-party apps, which allows iPhone users to watch live events directly on their lock screen and, for those with an iPhone 14 Pro or 14 Pro Max, on Dynamic Island.

Live activity will appear at the bottom of the lock screen on iPhone 14 and 14 Max models and earlier, while iPhone 14 Pro models will feature a feature set at the top of the screen to work with the new Dynamic Island.

iCloud Shared Photo Library

iOS 16.1 makes it easy for users to share photos and videos with up to five people with the iCloud Shared Photo Library feature. By setting up a shared gallery, users can allow photos taken by themselves to be sent directly to the gallery, and allow users in groups to add, edit, favorite, caption, and delete photos.

Enter the Home app

Matter, the new smart home connectivity standard, will now be supported in the Home app. This allows a wider selection of smart home accessories to work together, whether it’s Google Home, Amazon Alexa, and of course Apple’s Homekit.

Dynamic Island Reachability Support

For those with an iPhone 14 Pro or 14 Pro Max, iOS 16.1 will bring Reachability support to make one-handed access easier. It lowers the top of the iPhone‘s display by swiping down on the bottom of the screen. This is an optional feature that can be turned on through accessibility settings.

Key Sharing in Apple Wallet

iPhone users will be able to share their car, hotel room and other keys through iOS 16.1’s key sharing feature. This can be shared via messaging apps, including Messages and WhatsApp. What’s more, Apple Card customers will have access to a savings account that will automatically deposit “Daily Cash” cash back rewards into a high-yield savings account.

>>>>>>>>>>>Apple battery

Android 13 and iOS 16 are no different: A look at four common features

 There was a time when Android and iOS were two completely different worlds, each with a completely different target audience and experience. But as both operating systems become more mature, the difference between them becomes less obvious. The latest iterations — Android 13 and iOS 16 — are now more similar than ever. Today, we’ve listed some of the latest features that actually help bridge the gap between these two beasts.

Android 13 and iOS 16: Customization

When people think of Android, they think of infinite customization across interfaces – and iOS is seen as the exact opposite. However, this has changed dramatically since iOS 14 introduced custom icons and widgets. In iOS 16, both the home screen and the lock screen can be customized. Apple has also added widget support to the lock screen, which is no longer an option on Android.

On iOS 16, users can choose from multiple widgets, customize colors, and use depth effects with wallpapers for a truly unique look. When it comes to customizing the lock screen, Apple’s iOS 16 actually beats Android here.

In Android 13, the “Material You” theme actually goes one step further, even customizing the app’s icon based on the overall system color theme. That’s not yet an option on iOS 16, but it’s safe to say that both operating systems now offer users a ton of customization.

Android 13 vs. iOS 16: Language options per app

While iOS has supported per-app language switching starting with iOS 13, Android only got it in its latest version. The feature makes apps on both operating systems more friendly to multilingual users who may prefer to access certain apps in a language different from the system default. Once set up, the feature works very similarly on both – although setting it up on either is a completely different experience.

On Android phones running Android 13 — still very limited given the fragmented ecosystem — you can do this directly from the app info page. This can be accessed via the menu that pops up when you long-press any app icon. Meanwhile, on Apple, you need to launch System Settings and search for the app in the app list. Click on it and then you will find that option. Keep in mind that not all apps on iOS and Android add support for multiple languages.

Android 13 and iOS 16: Focus Mode

The feature actually has the same name on Android and iOS, although the two are implemented slightly differently. In fact, Apple’s version recently got a major upgrade with iOS 16. For iPhone users, Focus has dedicated modes such as Do Not Disturb, Driving, Personal, Sleep or Work. You can customize these modes to ensure that only certain apps are allowed to show notifications, and that only selected people can call you. Apple’s implementation even allows you to hide certain parts of the app and show only the parts relevant to your focus.

Meanwhile, Android’s Focus Mode will gray out the icon of the selected app and “pause” it. It also ensures that their notifications are hidden. If you tap the app, it will notice that focus mode is on, but you can choose to use it for five minutes. Android 13 will also let you see a schedule for Focus Mode. So this will be turned on at a specific time each day according to your preference.

Android 13 and iOS 16: Dictation

Both operating systems have supported text-to-speech functionality for several years. But only recently has this become accurate enough that users can really consider giving up typing. The Pixel 6 series introduced a very powerful dictation feature in Android 12 last year, but Apple is catching up this year with iOS 16.

With Android 13 and iOS 16, you can now talk and type seamlessly across both platforms, and handle punctuation automatically. Another common feature is support for emoji, which you can add to your text using just your voice. The steps to start voice dictation are the same – on iOS you just tap the microphone icon in the bottom right corner of the keyboard, and on Gboard on Android it’s in the top right corner.

>>>>>>>>>Phone battery

Why the M1 iPad Pro might be a better buy now than the new M2 model

 Apple released a new generation of iPad Pro this week. Even though it comes with Apple’s latest M2 chip, there’s not much new on these iPads. For those considering buying a new iPad Pro, the M1 model seems more appealing than ever. That’s why the M1 iPad Pro is still a good choice.

Some of us expected the new iPad Pro update to be more important than it actually appeared. For example, Apple chose to keep the same design as the previous-generation M1 iPad Pro — not a bad thing, but there are a few areas that could be improved.

The M2 iPad Pro is not a big upgrade

In the new 10th-generation iPad, Apple put the front-facing camera in landscape mode, so it looks more natural when users are in a video conference. It’s a much-needed change for many iPad users, but the new iPad Pro doesn’t get it. There were rumors that the new iPad Pro would get inductive wireless charging somehow, but that didn’t happen either.

The big news for the new iPad Pro is definitely the M2 chip. But honestly, it’s not big news. Of course, the M2 is faster. But compared to the M1 chip, the difference probably won’t change your workflow unless you’re a heavy user. The M2’s CPU is 15% faster than the M1. The vast majority of users have a hard time noticing the difference, especially when iPadOS has few features or apps that push its limits. In terms of graphics performance, the difference becomes even more pronounced, as the M2 chip’s GPU is about 35 percent more powerful than the M1’s GPU. But again, only a handful of iPad apps take advantage of this performance.

Another new feature unique to the M2 iPad Pro is the “hover” feature of the Apple Pencil. In other words, the display is now able to detect when the Apple Pencil is hovering over the screen to more accurately show where the user will be touching, improving the accuracy of writing and drawing. This is certainly a useful feature for anyone who uses the Apple Pencil on a daily basis.

There are some other spec enhancements in the new iPad Pro. It supports the Wi-Fi 6E standard for faster transfer speeds, as well as more 5G frequency bands than before. But again, that’s not something everyone notices when dealing with routine tasks. Meanwhile, the cameras are the same as on the M1 iPad Pro, and Apple didn’t bring the Mini-LED display to the smaller 11-inch model.

Which one should you get?

At this point, if you’re considering upgrading from an older iPad or considering buying your first iPad, I firmly believe that the M1 iPad Pro is still a good option, maybe even better than the M2 model. It’s still a super-powerful device that supports all the latest iPadOS 16 features, including Stage Manager. The M1 iPad Pro also features technologies like ProMotion, Thunderbolt support and up to 2TB of storage and 8GB or 16GB of RAM. Which one would you choose?

>>>>>>>>>iPad battery

The new iPad 2022 is almost an iPad Air — but it’s missing these essential features

 Apple’s new iPad 2022 gives the popular entry-level tablet a much-needed revamped design. Now with a large 10.9-inch Liquid Retina display, A14 Bionic, USB-C port and advanced cameras, the 10th generation iPad looks very familiar with another popular Apple tablet: the iPad Air.

Of course, the latest iPad Air 2022 now comes with the mighty M1 chip. Not so long ago, however, the iPad Air 2020 also featured the impressive A14 Bionic, which now powers the new iPad 10. With the same design, the same 10.9-inch display, Touch ID side buttons, and 12MP front and rear cameras, the updated entry-level iPad is closer than ever to the iPad Air.

With its similarities, the iPad 10 seems like a great, affordable option at $449/£499, while the iPad Air with the M1 is $599/£669. However, the standard iPad lacks some features compared to the iPad Air.

This includes the display. While both iPads offer 10.9-inch Liquid Retina (2360 x 1640) LED panels, each offering 500 nits of brightness, the iPad 10 only supports sRGB color overlay, which is in contrast to iPads that offer the industry-standard DCI-P3 wide color gamut Air is different.

What’s more, the new iPad’s display doesn’t have an anti-reflective coating like the iPad Air, which helps reduce glare. Plus, the iPad Air’s display is fully laminated, while the iPad 10 isn’t.

Another feature missing from the 10th-generation iPad is support for the second-generation Apple Pencil, as it only supported Apple’s first stylus. To make matters worse, since the first Apple Pencil charged via the Lightning port, users needed to use an adapter to connect the stylus to the iPad‘s newer USB-C port.

iPad 2022 still impressive

While potential buyers may lose some features, the iPad 10 still brings an interesting update. On the one hand, users will get the same front-facing 12MP ultra-wide camera as the iPad Air, but this time it’s in the top center of the display in landscape mode, meaning users won’t appear to be staring at the video call side. Also, expect the same 12MP wide-angle camera lens on the front.

What’s more, in the absence of the Home button in sight, you get the handy side button with Touch ID. The iPad 2022 (9.79 x 7.07 x 0.28 inches, 1.05 pounds) also has a similar slim and lightweight form factor to the iPad Air (9.74 x 7.02 x 0.24 inches, 1.02 pounds).

>>>>>>>>>iPad battery

The 2022-inch iPad Pro is closer to replacing your MacBook

 Apple has announced an update to its iPad Pro, bringing the powerful Apple M2 chip from the MacBook Air (M2, 2022) to the tablet. The new Pro tablet won’t get the fancy colors of the new iPad 10th-gen models, but it does offer some fancy new features for the Apple Pencil 2, as well as enhancements to media recording and playback, thanks to the M2. The iPad Pro is available for pre-order now and will hit store shelves on October 26.

The iPad Pro is powered by the Apple M2 chip, which will include new image processing and media engines that can enhance video capture and editing. The iPad Pro will be able to capture ProRes video, but the camera itself hasn’t gotten an upgrade from the previous model’s Pro camera array. You still get the same 12MP main camera and 10MP ultra-wide-angle lens, with a 12MP selfie camera on the front.

The Apple Pencil 2 gets some new tricks with the updated iPad Pro. When the Pencil is 12mm above the screen and closer, the iPad Pro can detect its presence and enable a new hover feature. These seem to be aimed primarily at the art and drawing genres, but Apple says the iPad Pro will grow a text box when it detects a pencil, giving you more room to write.

Thanks to the performance of the new Apple M2 chip, the new iPad Pro will convert writing to text faster. Processing cores will only be 15% faster, which is a modest upgrade, but there will also be a more significant boost in Neural Engine performance. The Neural Engine is part of a chipset that handles machine learning tasks, including tasks such as speech recognition and handwriting detection.

Apple has made a major upgrade to the iPad‘s networking capabilities. The new tablet will support Wi-Fi 6E, a “fast lane” flavor of Wi-Fi 6 that uses its own radio frequency band. Even the iPhone 14 Pro lacks this Wi-Fi capability, but other new phones like the Google Pixel 7 Pro support it. The iPad Pro also gets more radio frequency bands for 5G compatibility.

The iPad Pro is an expensive beast, sitting at the top of Apple’s massive tablet pyramid. Prices start at $799/£899/AU$1,399 for the 11-inch model, or you can buy it for $999/£1,079/AU$1,649 over 5G. You can get started for just $1,099 / £1,249 / AU$1,899 for the 12.9-inch iPad Pro, or $1,299 / £1,429 / AU$2,149 for 5G.

The 12.9-inch iPad Pro gives you a more advanced display than the 11-inch iPad Pro. You get Apple’s XDR branding, which includes a mini-LED backlight with local dimming. Both monitors have the same 264ppi pixel density.

Analysis: iPad Pro updated to support premium OS

The iPad Pro update isn’t the most exciting. The processor is only slightly faster. The pen hover feature is similar to what we saw on Samsung Galaxy Note II phones in 2012, and we didn’t find them useful at the time either. So what’s new?

The Apple M2 chip isn’t a bragging chipset, but it will power the major new features in iPad OS 16.1. The new Stage Manager feature will make multitasking useful on the iPad, a historic struggle. New external monitor support will let you connect a monitor to your iPad instead of just using the iPad as an external monitor.

Apple has long said the iPad is a full-fledged computer, and now we’re seeing them get closer in newer operating systems. Of course, all new iPads will get the same iPadOS, but the new iPad Pro will only do a better job of helping the iPad tablet get closer to the iPad desktop status.

>>>>>>>>>iPad battery

Pixel Watch vs Galaxy Watch 5: How to choose between Android watches

 The Google Pixel Watch and Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 are two high-end Android watches aimed at targeting Apple Watch dominance in the smartwatch space. Both run the latest version of Wear OS, have circular displays, track similar workouts and have many similar fitness sensors. But how do these two Android watches compare when used in the real world, not just by looking at specs on paper? Let’s take a look at it in detail below!

Pixel Watch and Galaxy Watch 5 design and screens

The Google Pixel Watch features a curved screen for a sleek look, with a digital crown and side buttons. The Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 has a flat screen with two side buttons. It’s not a crown, but a virtual touch bezel around the screen. Move your finger around the bezel to navigate between menus and options.

Comfort-wise, the Pixel Watch looks and feels better on my small 152mm wrist, especially for sleep tracking, but may be too small for some wrists. That might immediately get you looking for a bigger watch and put the Galaxy Watch 5 in your favor.

The bezel around the Pixel Watch’s screen does a lot of work, but it’s only really noticeable when you have a lighter watch face in the background. Don’t forget that if your hands are sweaty or wet, especially during a workout, physical controls like the Pixel Watch’s crown are easier to control, unlike the Galaxy Watch 5’s touch bezel, which has nothing on you The fingers simply don’t work well when hydrated.

Each has a bright OLED screen that maxes out at 1,000 nits. This means they are all very easy to see in direct sunlight. They can also stay on all the time, if you want to avoid lifting your wrist or tapping the screen.

Water resistance is a feature of both watches, but only the Galaxy Watch 5 has an official IP68 rating, making it dust and water resistant. The Pixel Watch is water resistant to 5ATM or 50 meters.

Both have speakers and microphones: you can take calls, dictate messages, and hear notifications read aloud, but only the Galaxy Watch 5 lets you play music from the speakers.

Pixel Watch and Galaxy Watch 5 health and fitness features

Both watches have all the basics: tracking steps, calories, sleep, and many types of exercise. The Pixel Watch relies heavily on Fitbit’s interface and ecosystem for exercise tracking, so you’ll find all of your health data integrated in the Fitbit app. Galaxy Watch 5 uses the Samsung Health app. You can also choose to use Google Fit on either, but you’ll get the most powerful experience with each company’s proprietary app.

On the other hand, the Galaxy Watch 5 can automatically detect outdoor activities like walking and running. It’s something I miss so much when using the Pixel Watch because it can’t do it — although other Fitbit trackers can.

The Galaxy Watch 5 also has some additional sensors that might be appreciated, such as bioimpedance for measuring body composition. There is also a temperature sensor, but it was not active when comparing. There’s also an ECG or EKG app, but you’ll need a Galaxy phone to use it unless you sideload the Health Monitor app on another Android phone.

The Pixel Watch also has an EKG, but it works on any Android phone. Both watches also feature blood oxygen trackers, which aren’t yet enabled on the Pixel Watch. It also doesn’t have high and low heart rate alerts or irregular heart rhythm alerts like the Galaxy Watch 5.

Both have built-in GPS, and they each lock onto a signal within about five seconds of being out. Compared to controlling the phone, the Pixel Watch is more accurate at calculating distance, but things like step count and pace are all within the same range of each other.

The heart rate sensor on the Pixel Watch is also closer in accuracy to a chest strap than the Galaxy Watch 5; if I want the best results from my cardio, the Pixel is my watch of choice.

Sleep tracking was also excellent on the Pixel Watch, and not only was the sleep score more reflective of my overall sleep quality, but the Galaxy Watch 5 continued to give me shockingly low blood oxygen at night.

Pixel Watch vs Galaxy Watch 5 battery life comparison

For general use, including always-on display, notifications, and a one-hour GPS workout, I got 21 hours on the Galaxy Watch 5 version and up to 20 hours on the Pixel Watch. Typically, you’ll need to charge both before tracking sleep, especially if the Pixel Watch’s battery life drops by more than 20 percent overnight.

The Galaxy Watch 5 supports reverse wireless charging, so you can put it on the back of some Samsung phones to charge it. The Samsung watch went from flat to 45% in 30 minutes and took about 1.5 hours to reach 100%. The Pixel Watch charges at a comparable rate, taking at least 30 minutes for the same 45% charge and about 1.5 hours to 100%. Neither comes with a USB-C charging brick.

>>>>>>>>>>>Samsung Watch battery

iPhone 14 battery life results – here are all four models

 If you’re planning to upgrade to one of Apple’s new iPhones, you’ll definitely want to know the iPhone 14’s battery life, and results vary by model. Of course, there are many ways to measure battery life, but we’ll use our own tests to evaluate each phone to see which one is good enough to make our best phone battery life list. Let’s take a look below!

iPhone 14 battery life

In our battery test, the regular iPhone 14 lasted a solid but unobtrusive 9 hours and 28 minutes. We think anything over 11.5 hours is great.

Apple’s 6.1-inch phone has a relatively small 3,279 mAh battery, but it actually outpaces the Galaxy S22’s larger 3,700 mAh battery, which has a runtime of 8:02.

The Google Pixel 7 has an average battery life of 7 hours and 14 minutes, which is a sizable 4,355 mAh battery. So overall, the iPhone 14 beats the smaller flagship phones in terms of battery life.

iPhone 14 Plus battery life

Apple dropped the iPhone mini model from the iPhone 14 Plus lineup this year, and it’s proving to be a good option for those looking for a big screen and long battery life at a low price.

The iPhone 14 Plus and its 4,325 mAh battery lasted up to 11 hours and 57 minutes of web browsing over a 5G network. That’s more than enough for our best phone battery life list, and it’s significantly higher than the 10:26 result from the Galaxy S22 Plus’ 4,500 mAh battery. So you get about 1.5 hours more battery life compared to a phone of the same size from Samsung.

The Pixel 7 Pro didn’t even come close, as it averaged just 7:54 in the 5 battery tests, and that’s using a 5,000 mAh battery.

iPhone 14 Pro battery life

The iPhone 14 Pro’s 3,200 mAh battery drained in 10 hours and 13 minutes, compared to 9:28 for the regular iPhone 14 and its 3,279 mAh battery.

Now, you might be wondering why when the iPhone 14 Pro has the same size display and the iPhone 14 Pro has a slightly smaller battery, they last longer than the regular iPhone 14. I have several theories.

First, the iPhone 14 Pro has a more efficient 4nm A16 Bionic processor, while the iPhone 14 has an older A15 Bionic chip. The iPhone 14 Pro can dynamically adjust its screen refresh rate from 120Hz to 1Hz, while the iPhone 14 stays at 60Hz. When the action on the screen is static, dropping to 1Hz can improve battery life.

iPhone 14 Pro Max battery life

When it comes to battery life, the iPhone 14 Pro Max is the clear champion. Its 4,323 mAh battery lasted an epic 13 hours and 39 minutes on average. That’s more than 3 hours more than the 10:18 runtime of the Galaxy S22 Ultra’s 5,000 mAh battery.

This 6.7-inch iPhone should easily last you a day or more without recharging. It even outlasted the similarly sized iPhone 14 Plus by about 1.5 hours.

>>>>>>>>>>>>iPhone battery

Pixel 7 Pro vs iPhone 13 Pro Max: Google’s new flagship faces old rivals

 The Google Pixel 7 Pro is finally here, and we have a new high-end flagship contender for 2022. But how does it compare to one of the best top phones of 2021, the iPhone 13 Pro Max?

While you might think of the iPhone 14 Pro Max as a natural, more contemporary competitor, it’s significantly more expensive than the Pixel 7 Pro. Will the iPhone 13 Pro Max be a better value option? Let’s take a look at the difference between them!

Pixel 7 Pro and iPhone 13 Pro Max prices and availability

The Pixel 7 Pro will be available on October 13, 2022. Pricing starts at $899 for the 128GB model.

The iPhone 13 Pro Max will be released on September 24, 2021. At launch, the 128GB model was priced at $1,099.

Pixel 7 Pro vs iPhone 13 Pro Max design comparison

Google‘s unique camera visor is back for another year, spanning from one edge of the phone to the other. The 2022 model makes that visor a shiny piece of aluminum, rather than glass, and now appears to emerge from the edge of the device.

The Pixel 7 Pro is a classic kit. Its greenish-gray hue matches perfectly with the gold bezel and camera module. You can also get snow and obsidian options if you want.

Apple’s color options for the 13 Pro Max include Graphite, Gold, Silver, Sierra Blue, and Alpine Green.

At 162.9 x 76.55 x 8.9 mm, the Google Pixel 7 Pro is taller, narrower and thicker than the iPhone 13 Pro Max at 160.8 x 78.1 x 7.65 mm. At 212 grams, the iPhone 13 Pro Max is also light at 238 grams.

Both phones are IP68 certified, but the iPhone 13 Pro Max is tested to withstand greater depths, has a more scratch-resistant ceramic shield covering the display, and a better-quality stainless steel bezel. The Pixel 7 Pro features Gorilla Glass Victus on the front and back, and aluminum rims.

Pixel 7 Pro vs iPhone 13 Pro Max display comparison

Both phones feature 6.7-inch OLED displays with a variable 120Hz refresh rate that can be dropped to 10Hz.

However, the Pixel 7 Pro’s screen is sharper, with a 1440 x 3120 (QHD+) output that compares favorably to the iPhone 13 Pro Max’s 1284 x 2778 resolution. Google’s screen has also gotten brighter, offering a peak brightness output of 1500nits instead of the iPhone’s 1200nits equivalent. Google is also offering an in-display fingerprint sensor option to complement the new facial recognition system, an option Apple continues to resist.

Pixel 7 Pro vs iPhone 13 Pro Max camera comparison

The Pixel 7 Pro features a 50MP main camera sensor, a 12MP ultra-wide sensor, and a 48MP telephoto sensor with OIS.

Apple’s iPhone 13 Pro Max offers three 12MP sensors, with the main sensor backed by a more advanced sensor-shift stabilization system. Telephoto is supported by normal OIS, just like the Pixel.

Google wins at telephoto, not necessarily because of the higher pixel count, but because it can reach 5x optical zoom. Apple’s telephoto can only extend to 3 times. Beyond this level of optical zoom, the Pixel 7 Pro can reach a digital zoom range of 30x, while the iPhone 13 Pro Max can only reach 15x.

Both ultrawide sensors support macro shots, which is an interesting parallel via a dedicated auto mode.

Pixel 7 Pro and iPhone 13 Pro Max specs and performance

The Pixel 7 Pro runs on Google’s new Tensor G2 processor, which isn’t much of an improvement over the Pixel 6 Pro’s Tensor chip.

It still lags far behind the iPhone 13 Pro Max and its A15 Bionic chip in raw CPU and GPU output, although the latter chip itself has been replaced.

What Google will point to in Tensor G2, however, is its advanced machine learning capabilities. It supports unique features like real-time voice transcription, as well as supernaturally clear voice calls and the aforementioned photo deblurring. Google also claims the new processors are more power efficient than before. It’s manufactured using the 4nm standard, which is more efficient than the 5nm production method Apple used on the 13 Pro Max.

Apple offers four storage options: 128GB, 256GB, 512GB, and 1TB. Google only offers 128GB, 256GB and 512GB to choose from.

Pixel 7 Pro vs iPhone 13 Pro Max battery comparison

The Pixel 7 Pro has a 5,000mAh battery, which is significantly larger than the 4,352mAh battery in the iPhone 13 Pro Max.

Apple’s systems are traditionally more frugal, so a direct comparison of battery size is meaningless. The iPhone 13 Pro Max can handle a full day of intensive use with a third of the tank remaining.

Google is apparently closing that gap with the Pixel 7 Pro. Its new Tensor G2 chip is more efficient, and Google claims the 7 Pro can last up to 24 hours on a single charge. The company has also implemented a new extreme power saving mode in which the phone can reportedly last a full 72 hours.

Wired charging speeds on both phones are impressive. The iPhone 13 Pro Max and Pixel 7 Pro top out at just 23W.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Phone battery