Should I buy a 55-inch 8K TV?

2020 has been a big year for 8K TVs. After some hesitant forays into the technology, its biggest advocates are plunging ahead with multiple models featuring the high resolution – but at what sizes do you really see the benefit?

As standard, 8K TVs don’t usually get smaller than a 65-inch size – and tend to come with 75-inch and even 85-inch sizes too. In the US, the flagship Samsung 8K QLED this year, the Q950TS, only comes in an 85-inch size, which speaks to the kind of big-screen experience Samsung is pushing for its 8K sets.

There is, however, the odd appearance of a 55-inch 8K TV. A kind of mid-size, super-high resolution set bringing 8K to a more compact form factor and lower price point. But is an 8K TV still worth it on a 55-inch screen?

Is a 55-inch 8K TV worth it?

55 inches is normally the flagship size for a 4K TV, with 4K resolution not being found on smaller 32-inch TVs, and starting to be worth including on 40-inch TVs. When you get to sizes larger than 55-inch, of course, it takes more pixels to appear like a detailed picture. 

4K still looks great on a 65-inch screen, or a 75-inch TV in our minds – though there’s no denying that the pixel density decreases as you expand the size of the display.

Pixel density is just what it sounds like: how close together pixels are crammed. If they’re far apart, the image loses sharpness, so a higher pixel density is generally good. An 85-inch 8K TV, for one, has 104 PPI (pixels per inch), which is the same density you’ll find on a 43-inch 4K TV. By comparison, an 85-inch 4K TV has only 52 PPI (yes, it’s exactly half the amount).

That means you need 8K resolution for an 85-inch screen to look as detailed and natural as a 43-inch set with 4K resolution – making a clear argument for the higher resolution at that larger screen size.

This gets muddier on smaller sizes, though. A 55-inch 8K TV has 162 PPI, but there isn’t a single TV size with 4K resolution that has such high pixel density – a 24-inch or 32-inch TV would get close, but you simply don’t need that many pixels on such a small screen.

A Samsung rep tells us that 8K isn’t overly necessary at 55 inches, really coming into its own at 65 inches and above. So you might want to spend your pennies on a great 55-inch 4K TV, or splash out on a larger size with 8K resolution – but we suppose the option of an 55-inch 8K TV is there for those wanting to test out, buy in, or show off the latest high-end resolution spec in their home.

What 55-inch 8K TVs are out there?

At the moment, 55-inch 8K TVs are limited to about one new Samsung TV a year. In 2019, it was the 55-inch model of the Q900R; in 2020, it’s the Q700T, a mid-priced 8K TV that comes in both 55-inch and 65-inch sizes.

The Q700T is currently only on sale in the UK, though US shoppers can still find last year’s 55-inch Q900R for just $2,299.

What’s interesting here is that the 55-inch Q700T starts at £1,999 (around $2,700 / AU$3,600), which is technically cheaper than the flagship 4K model, the Q95T – priced £2,299 for the same size. So there’s certainly a cost argument for getting a budget 8K model instead of a high-end 4K one.

You are making do with a 60Hz panel, though – so keep in mind, if you’re thinking of buying this set, that the frame rate isn’t what it could be. That also means you won’t be able to get 4K/120Hz passthrough from a next-gen games console, or even 8K/60Hz (there’s no HDMI 2.1 port, surprisingly). 

While the Q700T carries Samsung’s high-spec Quantum Processor 8K chip, it does make do with half the dimming zones of the Q800T, with a lower HDR rating, meaning both brightness and brightness control are likely to be lower. We expect some savings have been made in materials, too – though you’re still getting premium features such as OTS+ (Object Tracking Sound) for three-dimensional audio, though.

Smartwatch Mobvoi TicWatch Pro 3 GPS with Snapdragon Wear 4100 Review: Dual display and a large battery ensure a better battery life

With its display technology and powerful battery of an almost 600-mAh capacity, Mobvoi mainly wants to improve the weak battery life that is typical for WearOS – and it succeeds. The fact that the smartwatch uses “GPS” in its name, even though many wearables record routes at this point, is also justified: with GPS, Beidou, GLONASS, Galileo, and QZSS the TicWatch Pro 3 GPS is positioned very well.

Mobvoi TicWatch Pro 3 GPS

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100

Memory

1024 MB 

Display

1.4 inch , 454 x 454 pixel 459 PPI, Full touch, AMOLED, glossy: yes

Storage

8 GB eMMC Flash, 8 GB 

, 5.05 GB free

Weight

41.9 g ( = 1.48 oz / 0.09 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)

Price

299 Euro

Equipment and Case

For a long time Mobvoi held on to the older Snapdragon Wear 2100 from 2016 and even equipped the TicWatch Pro 2020 and the TicWatch C2+ with it in spring of 2020. With the TicWatch Pro 3 GPS, Mobvoi skips one SoC generation, becoming the first manufacturer to use the Snapdragon Wear 4100. This is a huge jump, since Qualcomm replaced the Cortex A7 cores of the two predecessors with Cortex A57 cores only now, and the LPDDR3 RAM building blocks of the Snapdragon 4100 have a clock speed of 750 MHz instead of the 400 MHz in the Snapdragon Wear 3100.

Performance Increase

There are no benchmarks specific for smartwatches, and the known browser benchmarks hardly run on the Wearables platform. But at least the Octane V2 Java Script benchmark will run. The result is 3580 points, which is not just significantly better than the Moto 360 with a Snapdragon Wear 3100 (1522 points). With the similar amount of working memory, the TicWatch also only needed half the time. In terms of the result as well as the time, the Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 with the in-house Exynos 9110 also fared worse with 2171 points.

Compared to the earlier mentioned TicWatch Pro 2020 and TicWatch C2+ smartwatches, Mobvoi has also expanded the storage, now offering 8 GB of ROM instead of 4 GB as before. However, after the setup only 4.4 GB of that are still available.

A microphone and NFC are standard for watches with WearOS, ensuring that Google Pay and the Google Assistant can be used. In addition they allow making phone calls using the connected smartphone without having to pick it up.

Dual Display

What is particular about the TicWatch Pro model series is surely its two displays. With Dual-Display 2.0, there is an additional FSTN LCD above a contrast-rich AMOLED, as you can see in the schematic below. The FSTN LCD uses less power and only refreshes the display once a second. When the TicWatch Pro 3 changes from the LCD to AMOLED, the LCD becomes transparent and the AMOLED shines through.

In other smartwatches, always-on means that instead of a black screen you see a reduced watch face when you don’t use the smartwatch. In the TicWatch Pro 3, there is no black screen. If you deactivate the selection “Always-On Display,” which is one of the standard settings in Google’s WearOS operating systems, the FSTN LCD continues to show the time and date and the number of steps taken, without using up much power for this. In addition, this display gives a technical or retro look that reminds us of the monochrome segment display of older watches.

The case is a visually appealing material mix of matte-black hardened nylon with glass fibers and shiny stainless steel. As its predecessor, it is also IP68 certified, but slimmer. The leather band from earlier models is replaced by Mobvoi with a silicone band in the leather look. This is a step back, and Mobvoi tries to hide this with orange-colored seams to give the illusion of a natural product. 

The smartwatch is operated by the touchscreen and two buttons on the side. Pressing twice on the bottom button will open the app that was used last. However, in our test, the apps froze regularly and stopped responding, rendering the shortcut useless and forcing us to reopen the app using the app menu.

Software

As in all the watches with Google’s WearOS, setting up the smartwatch is done using the similarly named Google app. In the WearOS app, among other things you can decide which notifications should be sent from the smartphone to the watch and select the widgets that are displayed to the right of the watch face using horizontal gestures. Google has recently lifted the restriction of a maximum of five widgets. Of the total of 14 available widgets, 10 could be installed. 

In addition, Mobvoi offers its own app in the Apple Store and in Google’s Play Store, which offers a few additional watch faces, some overviews of the collected health and fitness data, and a player for audio recordings of the TicWatch Pro 3 GPS:

TicRecorder captures a dictation with markings that the player of the Mobvoi app on the smartphone can directly jump to. An online service transcribes the texts into printable text upon demand. This worked well in our test, but only for English texts. The audio recordings are automatically synchronized by the watch. However, in our test the TicWatch regularly lost the connection to the smartphone, and reconnecting did not always succeed in the first try.

Health

In addition to the recorder and the Google Fit apps that are the standard on any WearOS watch, Mobvoi also packs the watch with nine apps for health and fitness, including one for noise recognition and breaks taken. 

TicHealth is the health center that stores all the measurements, analyzes them, and turns them into charts, including a daily as well as a weekly summary.

To allow the smartwatch to record steps, heart rate, and blood oxygen saturation, it needs the corresponding permissions, which are deactivated by default. Only after giving the permissions, the watch can also provide the sleep protocol and the corresponding diagrams. You can revoke each permission separately in the TicHealth watch app under the Data Privacy item. This can even be done temporarily to prolong the battery life by limiting the measurements, for example.

Training – Extensive analyses, but no elevation profile

An app called Fitify is installed on the TicWatch Pro 3 GPS. It offers animated guidelines through 22 workouts with a different emphasis, such as Balance and Coordination, a 7-minute training, Tabata, Everything for the Butt, Shoulders and Upper Back, as well as warmup and cool down exercises.

For the regular recording of your training, you can either start Google Fit or the Fit Training Mobvoi app. You can find you information and screenshots of the Google Fit app in our review of the Moto 360. This review will mainly focus on the Mobvoi app. 

While Google Fit offers almost 100 sport modes, TicTraining limits itself to 13, such as biking outside or on the track, pool swimming, rowing exercise, and the ellipsis trainer.

Thanks to GPS, you are independent of the smartphone when running or performing other workouts outdoors. In our test, it demonstrated that it was quickly ready to determine its location. If there are any problems, the TicWatch is able to optionally use the GPS of the smartphone, as long as you bring it along. While the TicWatch Pro 3 GPS has a barometer, it did not record an elevation profile during the time of our testing.

The top button pauses a workout. You can only stop it using the touchscreen by first swiping the training indicator off to the side and then pressing the appearing soft button for two seconds. 

In contrast to the health statistics, the training protocol remains rudimentary on the watch. Only the smartphone can deliver some revealing analyses, such as the step length and frequency when running. However, the item “Goal” remains unclear in the nordic-walking protocol below (In the screenshot of the German app below, this is mistranslated as “Tor”). Ball games such as handball or soccer are not included in the training portfolio of the TicWatch. And neither is nordic walking, which is the reason why it was recorded as a walk.

Battery Life – A large battery ensures a long battery life

In our tests so far, no other smartwatch with Google’s WearOS has lasted as long as the TicWatch Pro 3 GPS. While 3 days are still not much, this is considerably longer than the typical WearOS maximum battery life of about 1.5 to 2 days. If you use the TicWatch less intensely or deactivate some functions such as the regular measurement of the heart rate, the battery life lasts longer, while workouts with GPS will shorten it.

The decision for the FSTN LCD instead of the AMOLED does not add days, but only a few hours up to about half a day, depending on your usage. For comparison: during average usage with an illumination duration of 10 s (default: 5 s) and always-on display, regular measurements of the heart rate and nightly wearing, the battery dropped to 70% in 24 hours with the power-saving display, and with the OLED in the always-on mode to 65%.

We credit the battery life, which is long for a WearOS smartwatch, mainly to the battery that has a capacity rated at 595 mAh. For comparison, the TicWatch Pro 2020 had 415 mAh, the TicWatch C2+ 400 mAh, the Moto 360 (2020) 355 mAh, and the Oppo Watch even only 300 mAh, which is barely half.

Considering this situation, it is not possible to clearly determine whether the new SoC also has a part in this. According to Qualcomm, it consumes about a quarter less power compared to its predecessor. 

In Essential Mode with the FSTN LCD and without the smart functions, it runs up to 45 days according to the manufacturer. You can activate the Essential Mode any time and deactivate it later. It then goes back into the Smart Mode with a restart. 

The charging process takes about 2 hours.

Verdict

The TicWatch Pro 3 GPS differentiates itself from the crowd of WearOS smartwatches with a longer battery life and an extensive software package. For example, while the audio recorder is no killer feature, it often became useful as a quick reminder during the time of our testing.

In the rest of the apps, we also like the structure of the watch software: For example, TicWorkout not only starts a new workout, but also, triggered by a gesture, leads to earlier recordings and some overview analyses, and with an additional gesture to the corresponding options.

3 days of battery life is not much – but 50% more than in most other WearOS smartwatches 

While the performance increase of the new SoCs is measurable, it is less noticeable in everyday usage. Time consuming procedures such as the download of apps from the Play Store depend too much on other factors, so the TicWatch Pro 3 GPS can hardly complete them any faster than smartwatches with the Snapdragon WearOS 3100 or 2100 that can be navigated just as smoothly. 

In terms of its expandability using the Play Store, the TicWatch Pro 3 GPS with its fast SoC and large storage of course offers good prerequisites for more powerful apps, but at 299 Euros (~$355) it also belongs to the upper price segment of WearOS watches. 

Microsoft Releases Temporary Fix for Windows 10 Reset Bug

A recent Windows 10 bug found some individuals with “certain hardware configurations” unable to restore their computer to a previous state, but now there’s a fix.

The “Reset this PC” feature is typically found under the Recovery section in the Settings menu. When issues arise with the PC configuration, Windows 10 users can utilize this option to return their computer to factory settings. But a recent bug disabled it for anyone still running Windows 10 version 2004.

When making an attempt at resetting, an error message would appear instead: “There was a problem when resetting your PC. No changes were made.” Microsoft has come forward with a simple workaround. But the fix, which utilizes the Deployment Image Servicing Management (DISM), is meant as a patch for the problem until a real solution can be released.

The workaround, as Microsoft suggests, is as such:

1. Open an elevated command prompt. To do this, click Start, type Command Prompt or cmd in the Search box, right-click Command Prompt, and then click Run as administrator. If you are prompted for an administrator password or for a confirmation, type the password, or click Allow.

2. Type the following command, and then press Enter:

dism /online /cleanup-image /restorehealth

3. Reboot your system, and attempt Reset this PC again.

Before tinkering with your PC, make sure to back up any important files you don’t want to lose. Microsoft will likely announce some sort of more permanent fix in the coming days.

Lenovo Legion Phone Duel, a bizarre new gaming phone, is available to buy now

If you’re looking to buy a new gaming phone the Lenovo Legion Phone Duel is out today, and it might be great for the task if you can get around its one peculiar selling point.

You see, the Phone Duel seems designed for use held horizontally – its pop-up front camera and two rear cameras work best when you’re holding the phone sideways, as presumably you’ll be buying this phone if you’re spending most of your screen time gaming.

The phone is available to buy now from Lenovo’s website, and it’ll cost you £899 (roughly $1,175, AU$1,645) – that’s quite a lot for a smartphone, especially a gaming phone (which tend to have mid-ranged prices) but given the specs (which we’ll run through in a moment), the price may make sense.

We have yet to test the Lenovo Legion Phone Duel, but once we do we’ll make sure to test it thoroughly to see where it places on our list of the best gaming phones.

Lenovo Legion Phone Duel specs

The Lenovo Legion Phone Duel has a 6.65-inch screen, with a 1080 x 2340 resolution and 144Hz refresh rate, so it sounds like games will look good viewed on it.

The processor is the relatively new Snapdragon 865 Plus, joined by 16GB RAM, and that should ensure super-fast processing power. The 865 Plus has a built-in 5G modem, so you’ll be able to take advantage of the super-fast connection standard where it’s available.

In terms of battery capacity, you’re looking at 5,000mAh, made up of two 2,500mAh batteries. Lenovo predicts this will last a full day of use or seven hours of ‘intermittent gaming’, whatever that means. The handset can power up at a whopping 90W, which is the fastest we’ve seen in a smartphone, and even faster than the 65W of some Oppo phones, so it’ll get you back to full in no time.

The pop-up front-facing camera is 20MP (presumably this bizarre side placement is because the phone is designed to be use predominantly held horizontally) and on the back there’s a 64MP snapper joined by a 16MP ultra-wide camera. These rear cameras are in the middle of the phone, not at the top as in most devices, which is certainly a curious placement.

Finally, Lenovo says there are ultrasonic trigger buttons on the handset, which could function in a similar fashion to the Black Shark 3 Pro’s physical trigger buttons to enhance gameplay.

ASUS unveils GeForce RTX 3070 KO (Korean Origin) graphics card

ASUS KO – a special series for the Korean market

ASUS has unveiled its special series called KO, which stands for Korean Origin. These series are special edition only to be sold in South Korea.

A special team of designers and managers gathered feedback from Korean users on what they expect from a graphics card in terms of design, noise, temperature, and pricing. It took half a year to complete the design. The final design was selected from 10 candidates.

The first graphics card to be part of the KO series is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070. This graphics card has been designed and manufactured to underline its Korean Origin. Everything from the packaging to cooler design resembles the Korean culture.

The RTX 3070 KO graphics card is a dual-fan design with custom display connector configuration: 3x DisplayPort and 2x HDMI. The card is 2.5-slot thick and features dual 8-pin power connectors. The clock speeds have not been confirmed yet. The ASUS RTX 3070 KO will likely become availble on October 29th, when NVIDIA officially lauches its new graphics card.

Gigabyte Releases New AMD Powered BRIX Pro PCs

Gigabyte has spiced up its lineup of BRIX Pro mini-PCs with two new models, the GB-BSRE-1505 and the GB-BSRE-1605, powered by AMD’s Ryzen Embedded processors. Pricing and availability are unavailable at this time.

These AMD powered units are similar in size compared to Gigabyte’s latest Tiger Lake BRIX PCs, measuring 1‎96.2 x 44.4 x 140 mm. They aren’t the smallest BRIX units Gigabyte offers, but the extra size allows these PCs to pack more USB ports and display outputs, which can be handy if you need a desktop replacement.

The differentiating factor between the two units is the processor model. The GB-BSRE-1505 uses the Ryzen R1505G dual-core processor, while the GB-BSRE-1605 uses the more powerful Ryzen V1605B quad-core CPU. Surprisingly, both processors are on AMD’s first-generation 14nm Zen architecture. AMD hasn’t updated any of its embedded CPUs with more modern architectures, at least not yet, explaining Gigabyte’s choice in processors.

Both units feature a decent amount of connectivity; eight USB 2.0 ports, two USB 3.1 Gen 2 ports, two gigabit LAN connectors, and one headphone/mic jack. For display outputs, you get three HDMI ports on the Brix with the Ryzen dual-core and four with the quad-core unit (that features a more powerful Vega GPU). Unfortunately, you don’t get as many USB 3.0 ports or any Thunderbolt ports due to the older Zen architecture.

Memory support maxes out at 2400 MHz with two DIMMs supporting up to 32GB of RAM (16GB per DIMM). For storage, you get two M.2 slots – one supports NVME and SATA, and the other only supports SATA. You also get one SATA 3 port for 2.5′ SSDs/hard drives. 

Both units look good on paper and the connectivity is excellent, but the older Ryzen architecture holds these computers back significantly. Hopefully, Gigabyte will set pricing low enough to keep these PCs competitive. 

Never worry about USB port connectivity again with this dual connector thumb drive

The transition from USB Type-A to USB Type-C has not exactly been an expeditious one, mostly because the market is already flooded with devices built around the former. That’s why even the newest cutting edge motherboards typically offer more USB-A ports than USB-C ones. Kingston’s new DataTraveler Duo USB flash drive can plug into either one of them.

It’s a cleverly designed flash drive with a USB-C connector on one side and a USB-A connector on the other, either of which (or both) can be hidden in the slider-style casing.

“The addition of the DT Duo adds much needed functionality to the growing number of USB Type-C devices on the market,” said Carissa Blegen, flash product manager, Kingston. “The dual interface and unique double slider casing make the drive sturdy and stylish, with no cap to lose.”

Kingston is offering the DataTraveler Duo in 32GB and 64GB capacities. It is a USB 3.2 Gen 1 drive, which means it adheres to the original USB 3.0 specification, with a theoretical maximum bandwidth of 5Gbps. Navigating the USB standard is a little confusing these days, with the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) relabeling past standards. Here’s a breakdown:

USB 1.1 —> still USB 1.1 (Full Speed)

USB 2.0 —> still USB 2.0 (High Speed)

USB 3.0 —> USB 3.1 Gen 1 —> USB 3.2 Gen 1 (SuperSpeed)

USB 3.1 Gen 2 —> USB 3.2 Gen 2 (SuperSpeed 10Gbps)

USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 (SuperSpeed 20Gbps)

Thanks for the specifications soup, USB-IF. In any event, Kingston has not provided any specific speed claims, saying only that the USB 3.2 Gen 1 standard is up to 10x faster than USB 2.0. As a possible point of reference, the company’s DataTraveler 80 drive is rated to read data 200MB/s. That is also a USB 3.2 Gen 1 drive.

USB flash drives with dual interfaces are not super common, but this is not the first of its kind, either. SanDisk (owned by Western Digital) also offers a flash drive with both USB-C and USB-A connectors, in capacities ranging from 16GB to 256GB.

Kingston’s DataTravel Duo is available now, priced on Amazon at $10 for the 64GB model and $7 for the 32GB model.

AMD Radeon RX 6000 series, what we know so far

AMD Radeon RX 6000 series specifications have been known to us since Monday. This week AMD provided a lot of details to AIBs, including new (working) drivers, final SKU names, and so on. We have been able to cross-check parts of the specs and we feel confident that these are more or less final.

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT – Navi 21 XTX

AMD’s Big Navi will feature 80 Compute Units (5120 Stream Processors). This card will be (for now) AMD exclusive. The Radeon RX 6900XT will be the AMD flagship series, which according to our sources will be in limited quantity. The card would allegedly feature 16GB of GDDR6 memory across a 256-bit bus. The graphics card would feature a 2040 MHz game clock and a 2330 MHz boost clock.

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT – Navi 21 XT

The cut-down Navi 21 codenamed XT will feature 72 Compute Units (4608 Stream Processors) paired with 16GB of GDDR6 memory. This card will also feature a 256-bit memory bus and clock speed above 2.0 GHz. The game clock is expected to be 2015 MHz and the boost clock should be under 2250 MHz. These are of course AMD reference clocks.

AMD Radeon RX 6800 – Navi 21 XL

The RX 6800 non-X will feature Navi 21 XL variant with 64 Compute Units (4096 Stream Processors). Similarly to 6900XT and 6800XT it will also come with 16GB GDDR6 memory and a 256-bit memory bus. The clock speeds are lower for this part with an 1815 MHz game clock and 2105 MHz boost clock.

The Radeon RX 6900XT, 6800XT, and 6800 will all be unveiled on October 28th.

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT and 6700 – Navi 22

AMD is also releasing its Radeon RX 6700 series, but not this month. The RX 6700 series will feature Navi 22 GPU. According to our sources, AMD has recently decided to launch these GPUs quicker than previously planned. The current plan is to launch them in January. The Radeon RX 6700XT is expected to be full Navi 22 with 40 CUs (2560 Stream Processors). The RX 6700 XT Navi 22 graphics card is said to feature 12GB GDDR6 192-bit memory.

A few more things

Although we had the specs since Monday, another news outlet has been the first to publish the correct SKU/configurations before us. The information posted earlier today by Coreteks is more or less the same with some small changes to the clock speeds. We are however expanding this information with RX 6700 SKUs.

We will talk more about performance and special cache built into the Big Navi later (we are still collecting information). We can confirm also that AIBs will release their custom cards next month, but the priority is on AMD reference design. According to our information, the MBA (reference) cards will even have a separate review embargo.

iOS 14.1 and iPadOS 14.1 now rolling out with bug fixes aplenty

This Friday Apple’s newly unveiled iPhone 12 and iPhone 12 Pro are officially becoming available, and ahead of that the company is pushing out a software update to all of its supported phones and tablets.

iOS 14.1 and iPadOS 14.1 are now rolling out, and both of these are, as the minor version number incrementation shows, small updates, focused on fixing bugs.

And there are a lot of such fixes included, for sure. Here’s the full changelog courtesy of Apple itself:

– Adds support for 10-bit HDR video playback and edit in ‌Photos‌ for ‌iPhone‌ 8 and later

– Addresses an issue where some ‌widgets‌, folders, and icons were showing up in reduced size on the Home Screen

– Addresses an issue where dragging ‌widgets‌ on the ‌Home Screen‌ could remove apps from folders

– Fixes an issue where some emails in Mail were sent from an incorrect alias

– Fixes an issue that could prevent incoming calls from displaying region information

– Fixes an issue on some devices where selecting zoomed display mode and an alphanumeric passcode could result in the Lock Screen emergency call button overlapping with the text input box

– Addresses an issue where some users were occasionally unable to download or add songs to their library while viewing an album or playlist

– Fixes an issue that could prevent zeroes from appearing in Calculator

– Resolves an issue where streaming video resolution could temporarily be reduced at the start of playback

– Fixes an issue that prevented setting up a family member’s Apple Watch for some users

– Resolves an issue where the Apple Watch case material was displayed incorrectly in the Apple Watch app

– Addresses an issue in the Files app that could cause some MDM-managed cloud service providers to incorrectly display content as unavailable

– Improves compatibility with Ubiquiti wireless access points

The iPhone 12 and iPhone 12 Pro are expected to ship running iOS 14.1, or at least pop up an update notification for it as soon as you set them up. Apple is, at the same time, continuing development of the 14.2 branches of iOS and iPadOS, with a fourth beta seeded to developers. A final iteration of that software version will probably be out in a few weeks.

Philips OLED805 (65OLED805) review: One of the prettiest and most affordable OLED TVs in town

The Philips OLED805 marks another battle in the raging OLED price war. Those hunting for the truly vibrant imagery of OLED panels are still looking at significant outlays to ensure their pixel hungry desires are sated, but it’s getting heated out there. 

The best OLED TVs – which make up a lot of best TVs overall, of course – are a hotbed of competition among biggest brands, competing to deliver the best visuals, best design and, importantly, a great price. The Philips OLED805 enters the market as a perfect combination of all three.

Sadly for our US readers, this TV is available in the UK and Europe only – OLEDs at this price are dominated by the LG CX in the US.

Leaving the cheaper end of the market to the excellent Philips OLED754 (again UK-only – but the US has the Vizio OLED-H1 now) the OLED805 is an exceptional television that has it all and, despite undercutting the LG CX by £100 at the 65-inch size, the Philips 65OLED805 is anything but a compromise.

Its Ambilight-illuminated design is a thing of beauty, and the addition of AI to Philips’ picture processing technology takes the brand’s OLED picture quality to new heights. Add in universal HDR support, and the only real catch is when it comes to gaming.

PHILIPS OLED805 REVIEW: PRICE & FEATURES

The Philips OLED805 comes in two sizes: the 55-inch 55OLED805 for £1,499, or the 65-inch model we’re reviewing here, the 65OLED805.

At £2,199, the 65-inch Philips 65OLED805 is eye-catchingly affordable for a 65-inch OLED TV. The entry level LG 65OLEDBX has recently come out for just £1,799, but that set lacks the processing horsepower of either this Philips set or the £2,299 LG OLED65CX model that the 65OLED805 feels much closer to.

The 65OLED805’s extensive features list does little to suggest that Philips has cut lots of corners to hit its aggressive price. For starters, the simple fact that it’s an OLED TV, where every pixel can produce its own light and colour independent of its neighbours, will immediately warm the cockles of many AV fans. 

This is true of all OLED TVs, though. Where the 65OLED805 gets really interesting is in the ways it stands out from the OLED crowd. Starting with the new 4th generation of Philips’ powerful P5 picture engine. 

The P5 name refers to what Philips sees as the five main pillars of TV picture quality: source recognition, sharpness, contrast, colour and motion handling. In trying to optimise all of these five key picture quality traits, though, Philips deploys far more than five picture processing elements. In fact there are dozens of them, each applied in the best order to yield the most optimised results.

The new 4th generation of P5 is significantly bolstered by the addition of AI support. This uses knowledge learned by feeding thousands of different images through a neural network to more quickly and accurately identify and categorise incoming image types, enabling the TV to apply the most appropriate processing options in real time.

The system essentially divides everything into five categories: Nature, Face, Motion, Dark and Other. Any images put into the first four of these categories have all-new AI-calculated processing applied to them. Relatively unspecific images that end up in the Other category receive essentially the same (also excellent) processing they would have received on last year’s Philips OLED TVs. 

The promising picture features are backed up by a 50W, 2.1-channel audio system that supports Dolby Atmos playback, while Smart features on the 65OLED805 are, as usual with Philips’ premium TVs, provided predominantly by Android TV (Pie). It’s good to see, though, that Philips is finally backing Android TV up in the UK with the Freeview Play platform. This works around Android’s ongoing ‘blind spot’ with certain key UK broadcaster catch up apps. Though it can’t solve Android TV’s current lack of an Apple TV app.

It’s also a treat to find that the TV supports both HDR10+ and Dolby Vision HDR premium formats, when most TV brands only support one advanced HDR option or the other.

At first glance the 65OLED805’s connections looks right on the money. Four HDMIs is as many as you’ll find on any TV right now, and two USB ports will be ample for most people (though some TVs provide three). There are the usual Bluetooth and Wi-Fi options, too.

There are, though, also limits to what the 65OLED805’s connections can do. They don’t support eARC, for instance, that might have allowed the set to pass through lossless Dolby Atmos sound via HDMI to soundbars or AVRs. 

Nor do they support ‘next-gen’ gaming features such as 4K at 120Hz Variable Refresh Rate, or the Auto Low Latency Mode standard for automatically setting the Game Mode when a console is turned on.

If you manually select the Game mode when using the TV with a console or PC, it reduces the time the OLED65805 takes to produce pictures to just over 33ms. This is an okay result, but we have seen other premium TV brands getting below 15ms. 

For those hunting down low latency screens, especially with the release of the new generation of consoles, take a look at our best gaming TVs. 

PHILIPS OLED805 REVIEW: PICTURE QUALITY

Philips has long been a trailblazer when it comes to picture processing, leading to its premium TVs consistently producing unusually dazzling colours, contrast and sharpness. At the same time, though, Philips’ processing love-in can cause pictures to look a bit forced and prone to digital noise. Which is where the OLED805’s new AI features come in.

We’re accustomed now to seeing AI features doing impressive things to sharpness and detail – especially when it comes to upscaling HD sources to 4K, or HD/4K to 8K. With the OLED805, though, the AI works across pretty much all aspects of the picture to make the results look more natural. Without, crucially, detracting from Philips’ traditionally aggressive approach.

So, for instance, skin tones are now much more consistently likely to look believable, without saturation levels feeling reduced. There’s more subtle shading in skin tones, too, ensuring people are less likely to end up looking like mannequins. 

The AI categorisation means, too, that while the rest of the colour palette still looks bold and punchy, it also looks more balanced and grounded in authenticity. There’s much less likelihood of certain tones ‘shouting out’ above the rest, for instance, or tipping from vibrant into gaudy.

Pictures retain the extreme sharpness and detail Philips is renowned for, but again AI is on hand to ensure that any sharpness processing is applied more intelligently. In other words, it seems to analyse the image in much finer detail, and apply its sharpening and noise control processing in a much more localised way that avoids such issues as grittiness, noise or stressed object edging. 

Native 4K and upscaled pictures aren’t perhaps quite as forensically sharp as they have tended to be on some previous Philips TVs, but the results are preferable overall. Especially as the more localised application of sharpening tools makes pictures look more three-dimensional.

Philips has thrown more processing power at removing blur and judder from motion than arguably any other TV manufacturer over the years. But with the OLED805, again, the latest processing reduces the likelihood of this processing causing unwanted motion side effects such as flicker or blurry haloing around moving objects. 

An excellent new PureCinema mode, in particular, does a superb job with 24fps films of reducing judder without smoothing the picture to the point where it starts to look like a cheap soap opera.

While the AI features work across all presets apart from Movie (which basically turns almost all of the processing off and actually functions as an ‘as the artist intended’ Filmmaker Mode), there is also a dedicated AI picture mode that gives you more specific controls over how strongly different aspects of the AI system work. 

Strangely, though, I found the Standard and Natural presets more effective in their out of the box state than the customisable AI mode. Effective enough, in fact, to make it much less necessary than it ever has been before on a Philips TV to keep heading into the menus to tweak various settings.

All this and I still haven’t mentioned how the OLED805 also benefits from OLED technology’s traditional prowess when it comes to contrast. Dark scenes look black where they should look black, rather than grey or washed out. And bright highlights in dark pictures appear without any of the brightness compromise or surrounding light haloes you get with even the finest LCD TVs.

As a result, while the 750 nits or so of brightness the 65OLED805 can deliver on a white HDR window covering 10% of the screen falls short of the sort of numbers LCD TVs can achieve, the set’s local contrast ensures that contrast-rich HDR images still look phenomenally intense. 

The 65OLED805 also delivers full-screen bright HDR shots with a surprising amount of brightness for an OLED screen – yet still delivers that extra ‘kick’ to the very brightest parts of images that helps separate the HDR men from the boys.

There are one or two relatively small flaws to report. Dark but detailed shots can very occasionally reveal faint vertical bands in the picture. Very dark shots can lose a little shadow detail too, though again this issue really is pretty rare/minor, and tends to disappear when using a Dolby Vision source.

Next, the OLED805’s noise reduction systems can be a little enthusiastic (especially when using the HDR AI preset) despite the new AI assistance, sometimes softening 4K sources to the point where they lose noticeable amounts of sharpness and detail. So don’t be afraid to set the NR systems to minimum or even turn them off with native 4K. Though turning them off completely arguably slightly messes with the overall picture balance Philips’ suite of AI enhancements is trying to create.

As with any OLED TV, finally, it’s recommended that you take care over what you watch on the OLED805 in order to minimise the small potential for the screen to suffer permanent image retention. This essentially means trying not to spend excessive amounts of time watching TV channels or games that have bright static logos or HUDs.

PHILIPS OLED805 REVIEW: SOUND QUALITY

The 65OLED805 sounds better than it has any right to given its super-trim design. Especially if you’re not wall hanging it, and so can leave a few centimetres between the screen’s rear and your wall so that its three large rear-mounted drivers have room for manoeuvre. 

Sound is cast well beyond the left and right edges of the TV’s chassis, creating a powerful and immersive wall of sound. There’s plenty of well-placed detail within this horizontal splay too, and the sound has a surprisingly forward feeling to it for a TV that has no forward firing speakers. Voices are delivered with both clarity and context, and while bass isn’t particularly meaty, it’s present enough to make the sound stage feel quite dynamic, and sounds clean and distortion-free.

There isn’t as much verticality to the sound as I’d ideally have heard from a Dolby Atmos TV, but maybe this is just a case of the 65OLED805 sensibly accepting its limitations.

PHILIPS OLED805 REVIEW: DESIGN & USABILITY

The OLED805 is a seriously good looking TV. Way better looking than you’d expect given its price, in fact. The frame around the screen is extremely trim, and the outer edges of the rear panel are only a handful of millimetres deep. The main panel boasts a gorgeous brushed metallic finish, too.

The OLED805 carries a chunky black plastic protruberance over around two thirds of its rear, but you can’t see this from all but the most extreme viewing angles. It’s easy to forgive this chunky bit, too, when you realise that it houses both the OLED805’s unexpectedly powerful speaker system, and the LEDs necessary to deliver Philips’ unique Ambilight technology. 

Ambilight casts coloured light out from the TV’s edges that can either be set to a single colour for bias lighting purposes, or to dynamically track the colour content and brightness of the images you’re watching. This sounds gimmicky, but actually, provided you run the feature at a fairly low brightness level and mild level of ‘responsiveness’, it’s almost uncannily effective at making the image even more immersive. 

The OLED805’s screen sits on a pair of ultra minimalist metal feet that are really just crisp silver bars you can barely see when watching the TV straight on. In its standard configuration, the OLED805’s screen sits right down on these feet, further minimising their design impact. Handily, though, Philips provides a pair of feet ‘heighteners’ that can raise the screen up for people wanting to use the TV with a soundbar.

As mentioned briefly earlier, the OLED805’s new AI features make it considerably easy to get the best out of than previous generations of Philips TV. There’s much less need to keep revisiting the onscreen menus. That said, the menus are still dense, multi-layered and complicated when you do decide to engage with them. 

I personally still find the Android TV smart system less friendly than most rival systems. It’s not as customisable as some, for instance, and the way the home menu takes over the whole screen feels old fashioned. It also takes a quantity-over-quality approach to apps. It is at least much less prone to sluggishness and crashes than it used to be, though.

PHILIPS OLED805 REVIEW: VERDICT

The addition of AI technology to the OLED805 proves a masterstroke, finally enabling Philips to deliver pleasingly aggressive processing to pictures without the results actually looking processed. 

The fact that the OLED805 is also one of the prettiest and OLED TVs in town and is well-priced is just the icing on the cake.

For those who aren’t concerned about next-gen gaming features, but would like hugely immersive movies that don’t require any effort to get to peak quality (thanks to the AI processing), the Philips OLED805 is ideal.

PHILIPS OLED805 REVIEW: ALSO CONSIDER

The main competitor at this price point is the LG CX, which is almost identical in price to the OLED805 at the same sizes – though the 65-inch OLED805 is a little cheaper. The LG CX offers the next-gen gaming features that this lacks, and is similarly impressive in image detail. However, the OLED805’s speaker quality and its Ambilight feature go towards balancing that out. Our full LG CX review explains why we like that TV so much.

You might also like the LG BX as an option, if you want to save a bit of money, or put some money towards a soundbar. It’s a little less bright than the OLED805, and with less advanced processing, but is still an OLED screen with supreme rich black levels and stunning colours. Like the LG CX, it’s equipped with all the next-gen gaming features.