Category: Article

Taking low-light pictures on the Pixel 3 just got a whole lot better.
The camera on the Pixel 3 and 3 XL is already fantastic, but with Google’s latest over-the-air update available Wednesday, it gets even better. Known as Night Sight, Google first touted the feature during the Pixel 3’s original launch in October. The update lets you take better low-light pictures without a harsh, unnatural flash, meaning you can capture a clear photo of your dinnerplate the next time you whip out your phone in a dim restaurant.
Both the Pixel 3’s front- and rear-facing cameras will have Night Sight and the update will roll out to all Pixels, including the Pixel 2/2 XL and original Pixel/XL in the next few days. (The feature works best, however, on the Pixel 3 and its updated hardware.)
Night Sight works by taking up to 15 frames in a third of a second, so you’ll need to hold the phone steady for a second or two after firing the shutter as it renders the image. The camera uses machine learning to judge the right color, white balance and lighting conditions based on the content of the image, and if the camera’s gyroscope senses a notable amount of motion blur, it’ll shorten its shutter speed to reduce blur.
“Night Sight is HDR+ on steroids,” said Google engineer Marc Levoy in a previous CNET interview.
Night Sight is available in the camera’s menu option More, but if the camera senses a low-light scenario, a small dialog box will automatically pop up in the camera’s viewfinder to suggest turning it on.
The feature works impressively well. With dusk and night settings, Night Sight brightened up scenes with accurate colors and lighting sources that were true-to-life. But where it really shone (no pun intended) was in environments that had very, very little lighting. Cameras will always need some light to take a picture, but when I took photos in a dark room with very little light, the Pixel 3 managed to capture whole objects pretty clearly.
To see how well Night Sight works, take a look at these images below. Pictures taken with Night Sight enabled are on the right.
CNET editor Patrick Holland, who reviewed the Huawei P20 Pro, noted that phone has a similar feature. However, the Pixel 3’s photos ended up appearing more “realistic-looking.” In addition, while the Galaxy S9’s dual-aperture camera is a solid low-light performer, it blows out highlights and softens corners too much. The Pixel 3 with Night Sight captures images that are sharper and more detailed, and has a wider dynamic range overall.
Another CNET editor, Stephen Shankland, said he preferred the white balance on the Pixel 3’s Night Sight to that of the iPhone XS Max. In a photo of a park, for example, the Pixel 3’s image had warmer tones and colors were more true to life.
To see how these two phones fare against one another, check out the pictures below. Pictures taken with the iPhone XS Max are on the left and the Pixel 3’s Night Sight images are on the right.
In general, Night Sight works so well that it might end up spoiling you and giving you what you think is a “bad” low-light photo. There were a few incidents when I snapped a photo with the Pixel 3 and thought to myself that the image looked “terrible” because it looked grainy and I could see digital artifacts and noise. But soon after, I quickly realized I’d taken the picture in a near pitch-black setting and that it was noteworthy that the camera managed to capture anything at all.
For even more Night Sight pictures, click through the gallery below.

File associations no longer work properly on Windows 10 after a buggy update. Windows won’t let you select certain applications as your defaults. We tested multiple PCs running the stable version of Windows 10, and they all had this problem.
This is a strange bug. It affects some applications, but not others. For example, Windows 10 won’t let you make Adobe Photoshop or Notepad++ a default application for images or text files. But you can make other applications, like IrfanView, VLC, or Google Chrome, your defaults.
For example, here’s what happens when we try setting Notepad++ as our default application for .txt files in Windows 10’s Settings app. Windows just ignores our choice and chooses Notepad as the default.
The same problem occurs when we try choosing a new file association by right-clicking a file and using the “Open With” context menu. After picking Notepad++ and selecting “Always Use This App,” the file opens correctly in the application we chose.
However, the next time we open that file, it opens in Notepad rather than Notepad++. Windows just forgets our chosen file association.
Again, we’ve tested multiple Windows 10 PCs running the April 2018 Update and every single one we tested has this problem. It doesn’t affect every application, but it does at least affect Photoshop and Notepad++. This bug does not appear to affect PCs running the October 2018 Update, which was pulled because of multiple data loss bugs and has not yet been re-released.
Based on our research and various social media posts we’ve found, our theory is that this stopped working properly when Microsoft released the KB4462919 update on October 9. But we really don’t know. It’s broken on the stable version of Windows 10 today and it’s probably been broken for a while. This definitely used to work!
Windows 10 seems like it’s getting buggier and buggier. Why doesn’t Microsoft test things like this before releasing updates?

With the iPhone XR containing the same A12 Bionic chip as the iPhone XS, we expected it to offer identical performance, and this has now been confirmed. Macworld reported on the results it found from iPhone XR benchmarks …
The iPhone XR offers the same performance enhancements over last year’s iPhone X as its more expensive siblings.

The iPhone XR is right in line with the XS and XS Max—easily within a margin of error of a couple of percentage points. This makes it 13 percent faster in single-core performance than the thousand-dollar iPhone X of last year, and about 10 percent faster in multi-core performance.
In the GPU-powered Compute benchmark (which uses the Metal API), performance is about 40 percent faster.

Indeed, in one of the iPhone XR benchmarks – a GPU test – the iPhone XR came out on top, likely as a result of having fewer pixels to push.

The iPhone XR scores better in the GPU test than the XS or XS Max (which helps boost the overall score). This is probably due to the lower resolution of the iPhone XR’s display. The graphics tests here are rendered on-screen and not at a fixed or off-screen resolution. The A12 Bionic’s GPU will deliver faster frame rates on the XR because it has to render about 85 percent more pixels on the XS and 125 percent more on the XS Max.

Many iPhone XR buyers are likely to be upgrading from an iPhone 7 or older, and gamers will be particularly happy.

If you’re upgrading from an iPhone 7 Plus to an iPhone XR, you can expect real game frame rates to be anywhere from 50 percent higher up to twice as fast, depending on the complexity of the game. That’s a huge win for everyone upgrading their two-year-old phones.

The XR is also the model to pick if battery-life is your priority.

In this test, the iPhone XR ran 19 minutes longer than the iPhone XS Max, and more than an hour longer than the iPhone XS. In a real-world scenario (i.e. not running benchmarks nonstop), that will likely translate into about 30-45 minutes more screen-on time than the iPhone XS Max and two hours more than the iPhone XS, depending on how you use your phone.

The really interesting comparison, however, is with the iPhone 7 Plus.

They have almost the exact same-sized batteries—the iPhone 7 Plus battery is 2900mAh—and both have LCD displays with similar total area. The iPhone XR’s display has a total area of around 90 square centimeters, the iPhone 7 Plus about 83 square centimeters, about 7 percent smaller. Yet the iPhone XR, with its slightly larger display and same-sized battery, lasted about an hour and 45 minutes longer in this test.
That’s a roughly 45 percent improvement in battery life with a slightly larger display and similar battery capacity. What an impressive improvement in just two years!

iPhone XR benchmarks are unlikely to be the deciding factor for many buyers – that’s going to be the new design language at a significantly lower price than the flagship models – but it’s certainly good to know that the practice matches the theory when it comes to performance.
App-opening speed tests showed that the iPhone XR was on a par with Samsung’s Note 9. Check out the best and worst features of the latest iPhone.

Intel’s server roadmap and product families have been pretty calm in recent years. The company reorganized its server chips into the Xeon Scalable family and away from the old E7/E5/E3 designations in 2017, and it overhauled the Core X series, but it hasn’t made any dramatic changes to Xeon since AMD launched the Epyc family. Those changes are apparently coming in the first half of 2019, with the launch of Intel’s latest high-end Xeon parts, Cascade Lake Advanced Performance. Unlike standard Cascade Lake chips, these chips will offer substantially more cores and support for up to 2-socket systems.
Intel’s current line of Xeon Scalable Processors like the Xeon Platinum 8180, top out at 28 CPU cores. The new Cascade Lake AP chips, on the other hand, will pack up to 48 cores using an MCM. Intel hasn’t unveiled any details on its interconnect yet, though it seems incredibly likely to leverage Intel’s own EMIB (Embedded Multi-die Interconnect Bridge). EMIB is already used on Intel’s Hades Canyon / Kaby Lake “G” silicon, and we suspect it’ll be used here as well. Details of how Intel will connect the MCMs together or how many cores are in each chiplet — that’s the sort of detail we don’t have yet.
It’s not surprising to see Intel making this move. When AMD had 32-core CPUs in-market, Intel’s monolithic 28-core chips, with their higher IPCs, weren’t at an automatic disadvantage. But AMD is widely expected to push as high as 64 cores with next-generation Epyc, and we’ve known for years that Intel wouldn’t keep fielding monolithic chips forever.
Intel predicts performance that’s 1.21x better in Linpack than Xeon Scalable 8180 (3.4x better than AMD Epyc 7601), 1.83x better in Stream Triad (1.3x better than Epyc 7601), and a 17x improvement in AI/Deep Learning inference compared with Xeon Platinum at launch. We don’t have a launch date for Cascade Lake other than 1H, so it’s a good bet that whatever Intel fields will go head-to-head with AMD’s Epyc 2 silicon, codenamed Rome, and built on 7nm at TSMC. As large as 12 memory channels is, it’s not crazy — as CPU core counts scale upwards, motherboards need more memory channels just to keep things relatively balanced.
Like standard Cascade Lake, Cascade Lake AP will feature support for Intel Optane Persistent Memory DIMMs and the hardware-level fixes for problems like Spectre and Meltdown. In the absence of a formal release date, we’re betting these chips don’t tip up much before summer — by which point they should have company from AMD.

Samsung’s Galaxy X (or F, or whatever it’ll be called) may well be beaten to the punch by a device called FlexPai. Manufactured and sold by the folks at Royole, the Royole FlexPai is, indeed, what they call “the world’s first foldable smartphone.” Given the company’s development of flexible displays over the past four months, there should probably be no doubt that they’re capable of getting this flexible smartphone to market. Now the question is: which market?
Looking at what the Royole FlexPai does in the company’s first device preview, we can get a pretty OK idea of what’s possible. On a very basic level, this video shows what uses one might have for a flexible display-toting smartphone. This flexible smartphone folds back on itself, with one display, while Samsung’s solution is rumored to have one flexible display on one side, and another smaller display (non-flexible) on the other side on just half the phone.
As mentioned by my colleague JC late yesterday, this FlexPai foldable screen phone foreshadows the coming months. with more than one company on the brink of revealing their plans for flexible display-toting devices, this might well be the next notch. But it’ll be far, far more useful than the notch, which was absolute nonsense and should never have come to market in the first place – so says I. Below you’ll see a video showing further rolling of Royale’s display – it can do a whole lot more than just that one bend.
Here you’ll see some very basic uses for the device’s folding, transforming size. This device uses a version of Android called “water OS”, developed by Royole specifically for this device.
One of the most unique use-cases for this phone is the dual-view camera mode. With this, both sides of the folded device will show a view of the other side, both with forward-facing cameras. As such, both sides are sort of like mirrors, and both can capture a photo through the other. Weird, and most certainly unique.
Above you’ll see several more photos from the launch event for the FlexPai. These images show more flexible displays from Royale, a company that first announced they’d be making flexible displays (just like this one) approximately four months ago. Below you’ll see some more oddities from Royole.
As for the Royale FlexPai smartphone, they’re wasting no time at all. “Flash sales” of this device begin TODAY, November 1st, 2018. Further sales of the phone will commence in December.
The Samsung Galaxy foldable smartphone will have its user interface explored at the Samsung Developers Conference next week. We’ll be there to bring you the whole thing, front to back, as it happens!

We still have a few months of waiting ahead before Samsung unveils its Galaxy S10 series, but thanks to a bunch of teasers and reports last week we already have Galaxy S10 teasers to look at. And the purported all-screen, no-notch design of the Galaxy S10 looks better and better with each new render.
A few days ago, a Twitter user posted Galaxy S10 renders showing a phone with almost no bezels and a hole at the top of the screen where the selfie camera would go. Now, the same person is out with a new render of the phone.
It all started with Samsung teasing this particular display design for the unannounced Galaxy A8s. It’s not surprising to see Samsung launch new smartphone features on mid-range phones before they make it to flagship handsets, as Samsung is trying to make its other Galaxy devices more competitive.
A few days after Samsung shared its teaser, a very detailed Bloomberg report said the Galaxy S10’s “front camera is visible and tucked under the screen,” further fueling speculation that the Galaxy S10 and Galaxy A8s will share similar Infinity displays. Then, a screen protector that would accommodate such displays leaked, suggesting that some smartphone makers are about to launch phones with this nifty new design.
The huge downside of this particular type of design is that it doesn’t support 3D facial recognition, which needs a bunch of extra components, and would therefore need more holes in the screen. But if you don’t want Face ID-like secure face unlock on your phone, then Samsung’s screen design may be the best option for further increasing the screen-to-body ratio.
In the last few weeks, we’ve seen a bunch of novel approaches to “fixing” the notch. Some, like Huawei and OnePlus, have reduced the notch to a teardrop on some phones. Others like Xiaomi launched a phone with a slide-out selfie camera. Nubia, meanwhile, placed two screens on a smartphone with the rear-facing display meant to help out with selfies. That’s right, that phone has no front-facing camera.
But Samsung’s compromise sure looks like a much better idea than any of these. And Samsung isn’t alone thinking about such displays. Apple already has a patent that explains in great detail how to drill holes into screens, while camera supplier Largan is supposedly working on a pure black coating that could be applied to smartphone cameras so that the selfie cam would basically be invisible.

Despite some notable exceptions, many 2018 smartphone batteries can’t keep up. Here’s why — and what we can do about it.
Phone makers promise “all-day battery life.” Sure, and you haven’t stolen any of the kids’ Halloween candy.
If you recently bought a new flagship phone, chances are its battery life is actually worse than an older model.
For the last few weeks, I’ve been performing the same battery test over and over again on 13 phones. With a few notable exceptions, this year’s top models underperformed last year’s. The new iPhone XS died 21 minutes earlier than last year’s iPhone X. Google’s Pixel 3 lasted nearly an hour and a half less than its Pixel 2.
Phone makers tout all sorts of tricks to boost battery life, including more-efficient processors, low-power modes and artificial intelligence to manage app drain. Yet my results, and tests by other reviewers I spoke with, reveal an open secret in the industry: the lithium-ion batteries in smartphones are hitting an inflection point where they simply can’t keep up.
“Batteries improve at a very slow pace, about 5 percent per year,” says Nadim Maluf, the CEO of a Silicon Valley firm called Qnovo that helps optimize batteries. “But phone power consumption is growing up faster than 5 percent.”
Blame it on the demands of high-resolution screens, more complicated apps and, most of all, our seeming inability to put the darn phone down. Lithium-ion batteries, for all their rechargeable wonder, also have some physical limitations, including capacity that declines over time — and the risk of explosion if they’re damaged or improperly disposed.
And the phone power situation is likely about to get worse. New ultrafast wireless technology called 5G, coming to the U.S. neighborhoods soon, will make even greater demands on our beleaguered batteries.
My test has limitations. Your experience will depend on how you use your phone, and there are steps you can take to make your phone life stretch.
We’re not without hope. Two phones that performed well in my tests, Samsung’s Note9 and Apple’s iPhone XR, offer ideas about how to design phones to last longer — at least until a totally new battery tech comes along.

Why your phone battery dies

My results made me do a double take, so I called up a squad of other tech journalists also obsessed with testing at CNET, Tom’s Guide and Consumer Reports. “Our overall average battery life is coming down,” says Mark Spoonauer, the editor in chief of Tom’s Guide, who also found the iPhone XS battery died sooner than the iPhone X. Many of the phones with the longest battery life, he adds, are a year old.
But not all other reviewers have noticed the same declines — and the differences in our results help shed some light on what’s going on.
Larger phones often last longer, but it’s not as simple as the size of the battery inside. Remember the Blackberry? Those had much smaller batteries than today’s smartphones, but could go days without being charged.
There’s no perfect battery test. Mine, which I borrowed from an industry group called the Embedded Microprocessor Benchmark Consortium, particularly stresses the screen.
I use a light meter to set all the phones at the same brightness and then force their web browsers to reload and scroll through a series of sites I serve through a local WiFi network. I rerun the tests as many times as possible, and then average the results.
CNET, which like me found conspicuous dips in battery life between the iPhone 8 and iPhone X (and Samsung’s Galaxy S8 and S9), tests screens at 50 percent brightness playing a looping video with Airplane Mode turned on.
What we both discovered: phones with fancy screens that are especially high-resolution or use tech such as OLED perform worse. (That tech can require more power to push out light.) So if you want your phone to last longer, turn down the screen’s brightness. Or stop looking at your phone so many times each day, if you can break our nationwide spell of phone addiction.
Tom’s Guide throws another factor into the mix: the cellular connection. It makes phones run through a series of websites streamed over LTE. Unlike me, it also saw a big battery life hit to the Pixel 3 XL versus the Pixel 2 XL.
Another lesson: If you want the battery to last longer, use WiFi when possible — or even Airplane Mode when you don’t need to be reachable. Both Apple and Android phones also offer low-power modes (not reflected in our testing) that reduce some draining data functions without taking you offline.
The counterexample is Consumer Reports, which found the new iPhone XS lasted 25 percent longer than last year’s iPhone X. Its test uses a finger robot — yes, you read that right — to make phones cycle through lots of different functions and apps, including pauses in use where the screen turns off.
Consumer Reports is likely better testing the phone’s processor, an area where a number of companies — but particularly Apple — have made efficiency gains.
So overall, are battery lives decreasing or increasing? “You can’t make a straight trend,” says Consumer Reports director of electronics testing Maria Rerecich.
I wish companies had more standardized ways to talk about battery life. Since the earliest days of the iPhone, Apple has described battery life through specific measures, including “talk time” and “Internet use.” Recently it’s also taken on some more squishy language: The iPhone XS “lasts up to 30 minutes longer than iPhone X,” it says, a measure based on data about how long people go before plugging back in.
How phones are dealing

So what about the two 2018 phones that did better in my tests?
Samsung’s Note9 succeeds by stuffing in more battery. It contains a battery capacity of 4,000 mAh, up from the already-huge 3,300 mAh in the Note8. (The iPhone XS battery is only 2,659 mAh, and actually slightly downgraded from the X.)
Lots of phones have followed the bigger battery trend. iFixit, a repair community that performs teardown analysis of phone components, says battery capacities have almost doubled in the last five years.
How much further can the size game go? Huawei just introduced a phone called Mate 20 Pro, not sold in the U.S., with a 4,200 mAh battery. Larger, denser batteries can be more dangerous (remember Samsung’s exploding Note7?), not to mention heavier. The Note9, which also has a giant screen and a stylus, weighs 7.1 oz — more than twice a deck of cards.
Apple’s iPhone XR, the new phone I recommend to most people, has a different approach. It scales back on the screen tech — lower resolution, less bright and lower-quality color — in ways that benefit battery life tremendously: The XR lasted 3 hours longer than the top iPhone XS, even though the its screen is actually a smidge larger. (Bonus: It also costs $250 less.)
“Consumers have to start getting ready for compromise,” says Maluf, the CEO of the battery optimization company.
Perhaps the market will fragment further, making phones more like buying cars. That market was eventually upended by fuel-economy models; instead of the gas-guzzling Cadillac, you could choose the Honda. Apple’s iPhone XR is the Civic of smartphones.
Our near-future choices are likely either: Get an economy phone — or plug in more often. Faster and more convenient charging is the strategy for some makers. Lots of phones now support wireless charging, though still few cafes, offices and airport lounges offer it.
And then there’s the plug itself. Apple, which has shipped the same 5 watt charging brick for years, could take a lesson from Google, which sells its Pixel phones with an 18 watt charger and claims you can get 7 hours of use from just 15 minutes of charging. The one thing that’s almost as bad as running out of juice is being tethered to an outlet.

iOS 12.1 has landed and it is Apple’s AAPL +1.57% first major upgrade to iOS 12, bringing some major new features and important fixes. Unfortunately, however, it comes with two significant problems of its own…
The first is something that has become an increasing concern for Apple: lockscreen security. In short: a hack was discovered to bypass Face ID and Touch ID giving hackers access to your personal contacts. Moreover, the hack was found within just two hours of iOS 12.1 being released and it’s worryingly simple.
Shown off by in the video below by security researcher Jose Rodriguez, the hacker simply calls your iPhone from another iPhone and, once connected, the call is turned into a FaceTime video call and ‘Add Person’ pressed on the target iPhone. This brings up the device’s full contact list and using the 3D Touch shortcut on any contact reveals additional data such as their phone numbers, email addresses and more.
The flaw is specific to iOS 12.1 as it doesn’t work on any other version of iOS and, ironically, it affects premium iPhones most as cheaper models like the iPhone XR and iPhone SE don’t have 3D Touch.
But the biggest worry is how fast this hack was discovered.
Apple loves to promote its devices as having the best security in the industry, but this hack is far from a one-off. Rodriguez has found simple lockscreen bypasses in every iOS 12 release so far, with two in iOS 12 (1,2) and another in iOS 12.0.1 (link) prior to the iOS 12.1 hack today.
As for the other iOS 12.1 problem, iPhone 8, iPhone 8 Plus and iPhone X owners might want to look away now.
Despite Apple promising owners of these phones last year that they would not be subject to the same controversial performance throttling the company applies to older iPhones, iOS 12.1 has introduced it for all three models.
Forbes’ Ewan Spence has written about this, and Apple already faces almost 60 Class Action lawsuits in the US and legal action from multiple governments around the world for silently introducing what many deem is ‘planned obsolescence’ and Italy has already issued fines. So iPhone XS, iPhone XS Max and iPhone XR owners, clearly it will be your turn this time next year.
And note, this may not be the end of the problems.
My iOS 12.1 Upgrade Guide reports cases of graphics glitches, WiFi problems and battery life complaints. So you would be wise delay your upgrade unless you suffer from one of the flaws it does fix.
All in all, it’s a disappointingly rocky start for iOS 12. Especially given Apple has promoted it as being a back-to-basics focus on speed, stability and security. On the plus side, iOS 12 is packed with numerous secret featureswhich show Apple does still care about finely crafting its software.
What next? I would expect iOS 12.1.1 to arrive as a dedicated bug fix before the end of November. Unsurprisingly, Apple has already announced it is in beta testing…

In last year’s review of the 10.5-inch iPad Pro, AppleInsider called it the king of tablets. Apple’s new 2018 iPad Pro is so much better in so many ways that it is hard to even think of what to call it.
The main question that many existing iPad Pro owners will be asking is if it’s worth upgrading to the new iPad Pro generation.
For starters, the new 11-inch base iPad Pro is priced at $799. If you’re planning on using the Apple Pencil, you also have to buy the new second-generation Apple Pencil for $129, bringing the base model up to a grand total of $928.
Even with that price, it’s easily has the power and features to make it worth that much.
This is the iPhone X story all over again, as the new iPad Pro is basically an iPad revolution. It’s packing Face ID that works no matter what orientation you hold the device, a refined exterior design, a new edge-to-edge display, the first USB-C port in any iOS device ever, support for a brand new Apple Pencil, and shocking performance.
Last year’s iPad Pro also shocked us by outperforming Apple’s 12-inch MacBook in both processor performance and graphics performance, and the new iPad Pro is supposed to double the graphics performance and almost double the processor performance of last year’s model.
Geekbench 4 benchmarks have already leaked, revealing the new iPad Pro’s processor is nearing the performance of Apple’s new 15-inch MacBook Pro, and it’s even closer to the performance of the best processor in the 2017 5K iMac. The new iPad Pro actually outperforms the best processor in the 2018 13-inch MacBook Pro, and even the best processor in the 2017 15-inch MacBook Pro.
Of course, this is just Geekbench 4, which doesn’t factor in thermal throttling, but the raw power is incredibly impressive.
Despite the difference in size, the 12.9-inch model is identical in terms of performance, making the decision to buy one over the smaller version more based the mass and the cost than anything.
So, let’s say you already have a 2017 iPad Pro. Should you upgrade? If money isn’t an issue. Face ID and the new display alone should make the upgrade worth it, and you could probably sell your current iPad Pro for at least $400 to 450.
If you’re happy with your current iPad Pro and you don’t have that much spare cash, just stick with the 2017 model for another year.
For owners of older iPad Pro models, I would definitely recommend upgrading. The biggest things those models lack is a very bright and color-accurate display, Apple Pencil lag improvements, and 120hz ProMotion technology, which really makes the new iPad Pros shine.
If you’ve got any other kind of iPad, you should only think about if you really need the performance and the Apple Pencil support. The 2017 budget iPad for $329 supports the Apple Pencil and has a decent A10 processor, but the display is definitely lacking.
Apple has just released a brand new Apple Pencil, and next years’ budget iPad will probably support it, which means it’ll also come with the new boxy design to incorporate it. If you don’t need the extra power and the amazing display, you could just wait until March.
Now some of you may be thinking about skipping this year’s iPad Pro in favor of the 2019 model. Here’s something to think about.
Apple basically went all out on this new iPad Pro, and there’s a lot of firsts in this generation; it’s the first iPad to switch to this boxy design since the original iPad, the first with an edge-to-edge rounded display, the first with Face ID, the first with a USB-C port, the first with support for the new Apple Pencil, the first with a 7-nanometer chip that outperforms a MacBook Pro, and it’s also thinner than any iPad or even iPhone ever, if you’re not counting the camera bump.
Speaking of the camera, it gets the same wide camera as the iPhone XS, with the latest video recording improvements and features like Smart HDR and Portrait Mode selfies.
Based on that, next years’ iPad Pro models are unlikely to be that much different, and since it’ll be running on the same 7nm architecture, the performance won’t see as big of a jump as this year’s versions. It’s doubtful Apple will switch to an even smaller chip architecture for at least a couple of years.
There may be some changes here and there, but the 2019 models will generally be very similar to the 2018 iPad Pro.
If you’re thinking of upgrading to an iPad Pro within the next two years, you might as well just just upgrade right now. That’s the same advice we gave when the revolutionary iPhone X came out, and as you can tell by the iPhone XS, there really isn’t much different apart from the larger iPhone XS Max.
Here’s the rundown: if you’ve got a 2017 iPad Pro and you’re perfectly happy with it, don’t upgrade unless you’ve got a bunch of extra cash. If you’ve got anything else and you’re thinking about getting an 11-inch iPad Pro within the next couple of years, seriously just upgrade right now, because the 2019 iPad Pro won’t be that much different, and it definitely won’t get any cheaper.
As for the 12.9-inch model, it’s $200 more expensive, but the chassis is now significantly smaller than the previous 12.9-inch iPad Pros, making it a lot more convenient to use. If you’re trying to use your iPad Pro as a laptop replacement, the 12.9-inch model will be the better choice if you have the extra cash, while artists will enjoy the extra screen space that the larger model offers.

Where to buy

Apple authorized reseller Adorama is accepting preorders for Apple’s newest iPad Pros with no sales tax collected on orders shipped outside New York and New Jersey. Orders are filled on a first come, first served basis and your credit card will not be charged until the iPad Pros are ready to ship.
For product availability and the latest deals across multiple Apple authorized resellers, be sure to visit our 11-inch iPad Pro and 12.9-inch iPad Pro Price Guides.

The Pixel line is known for, above all else, its wicked cameras. But one problem a certain type of mobile photography enthusiast has run into with the phones is that they don’t currently allow for the use of external microphones in the default camera app. That’s set to change next week, though.
Some camera apps on Pixel actually do support external mics, making the absence of the ability in the default app even more grating. Today, though, a Google employee commented on a Pixel support thread from all the way back in 2016 to let users who have been asking about the feature for years know it’s coming October 18, the day the Pixel 3 and 3 XL launch:
Hi, folks — Isaac here from the Pixel Camera engineering team. I have been keeping an eye on this thread since the beginning and have good news. At the same time as Pixel 3 launch (October 18th), we will introduce support for Android-compatible plugged-in external microphones in the default camera app for all Pixels. I hope you all enjoy the update.
Isaac’s language suggests that all models of Pixel will get support next Thursday, which should be a boon to serious cell phone videographers. (Of course, if you’ve got a Pixel 2 or 3, you’ll also need a dongle.)