Month: September 2020

Nvidia and its add-in-board (AIB) partners are set to release GeForce RTX 30-series ‘Ampere’ graphics cards on September 17. But before launching something new, they need to get rid of existing GeForce RTX 20-series products. Apparently, this is exactly what Asus and Zotac are doing in some countries. 

Asus slashed prices of its GeForce RTX 2080 Super graphics cards by 50% in the Philippines, according to its Facebook page. Zotac also cut down price of its GeForce RTX 2080 Ti board by a whopping 55% in Malaysia, the company announced. Furthermore, those who purchased the board on or after August 9 can email Zotac and get Adata’s XPG SX8200 256 GB SSD ‘as a token of sadness.’

Other makers of graphics cards in different countries have yet to announce price cuts on their GeForce RTX 20-series products, but this is something to watch closely if you are happy with performance and features provided by the previous-generation GPUs. Meanwhile, internet auctions are flooded with second-hand Turing cards. For example, it was possible to get an EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti board for $565 at press time. 

Apart from the pending launch of the Ampere family of client GPUs, there is another reason why AIB suppliers are inclined to slash prices of their Turing-based graphics cards if they have many in stock. Owners of GeForce RTX 20-series boards are selling them off on internet auctions like Ebay. Competing against second-hand boards is hard even before the upcoming next-generation launch, but once the new products hit the market, it will get even harder. As a result, it makes a great sense for AIB makers to sell off their existing GeForce RTX 20-series boards if they have many of them in stock.

Cheap no more! The Edge Plus is Motorola’s attempt to compete with the best of the best the smartphone market has to offer. An assertive price and decent connectivity may look good on paper, however they are nothing out of the ordinary. But is it enough to go head to head with Samsung and Apple?

Back in May of 2020 we had the chance to review the Motorola Edge, a high-quality device somewhere in-between upper mid-range and high-end. The Motorola Edge Plus, or Edge+, is unambiguous about its ambitions, and regarded by Motorola as a true high-end flagship smartphone. At an asking price of more than $1,000 it has to compete against the best of the best the smartphone market has to offer.

Its weapons of choice are a camera with more than 100 MP, support for 5G, and a 90 Hz display with edge-to-edge display glass curving around its, well, edges – the hallmark of the Edge series. Let’s find out how well this new player performed in our review, shall we?

Case – Stylish, but not Waterproof

The Edge Plus looks very similar to its more affordable yet lesser equipped Motorola Edge sibling. It features the same edgeless curved display glass at the front and Gorilla Glass 5 at the rear wrapped tightly around an aluminum frame. The blue-gray rear cover is designed in a way that its surface scatters and reflects light creating very interesting reflection patterns.

At 203 g the Edge Plus is one of the heavier devices available, and it is most likely going to be too large for small hands thanks to its 6.7-inch display. When compressing the rear, the cover budged noticeably, and we could hear the air escape from the inside. For a device at this price point we would have expected more. Nevertheless, the device felt very good in hand and was very well made.

The case is IP52-certified, which is a lower ingress rating than most other smartphone manufacturers have to offer. It is not usable under water.

Connectivity – Plenty of fast Storage

With its 12 GB of RAM and 256 GB of storage the Motorola Edge+ is definitely a high-end device, at least regarding sheer space. Its price has already dropped noticeably – initially, Motorola asked for much more than its current street price of around or slightly less than $1,000.

A card reader for optional storage expansion is not available. In return, it features a 90 Hz display, support for wireless charging, and modern wireless communication protocols such as 5G, Wi-Fi 6, NFC, and Bluetooth 5.1. We were unable to find any weak points regarding the Edge+’s overall connectivity except for maybe an IR blaster that some users might have found useful. Instead, the Edge+ continues to support the oldie-but-goodie 3.5-mm headphone jack for use with analog audio peripherals.

Software – No Bloatware from Motorola

Traditionally, Motorola smartphones are preloaded with a pure Vanilla version of Android, and the Edge+ is no exception. It comes with Android 10 and security patches as of last month, which can be considered fairly up to date.

If you detest bloatware, aka useless preloaded apps taking up precious disk space, you will find the Edge+ to be very pleasing. We found no bloatware whatsoever, just some of Motorola’s own apps for device-specific settings or help, but no trial versions, adware, or other potentially annoying applications at all.

Communication and GPS – Fast Wi-Fi

When connected to our Netgear Nighthawk AX12 reference router, the Edge+ performed as fast as expected of a high-end device. Interestingly enough it turned out to be faster and more consistent transmitting data than receiving it. Signal strength is mediocre and was reduced to 25 % at a distance of 10 m (33 ft) with three walls in-between the smartphone and the Wi-Fi router. Other high-end smartphones offer much higher and more stable Wi-Fi reception.

Maximum speed when downloading data over 4G LTE is LTE Cat 22, and thus up to 2.45 Gbps. 5G is also supported, which adds an extra layer of long-term sustainability and future proofing. LTE signal strength was decent; however, we should note that other high-end smartphones often showed an extra bar or two on the signal strength indicator.

Obtaining location lock outdoors takes fairly long. Once obtained, GPS accuracy was very good at just 3 m. Supported location services include GPS and GLONASS, with no other satellite networks showing in our test. SBAS is not supported either.

In both Google Maps and during our real-world test on our bicycle tour around the block the Motorola Edge+ did a very good job. Safe for one or two locations, where it recorded our track straight through a building, the overall accuracy of the recorded track was very high. We can thus safely say that the Motorola Edge+ is well-suited for navigational purposes with high accuracy expectations.

Telephony and Call Quality – Noticeable Ambient Noise

Following Motorola’s mantra of offering a pure Vanilla flavor of Android the telephony app remained unchanged from Google’s default app. Which is nothing to worry about, because the default app offers everything you might need in a neatly organized and clearly arranged design. As expected of a high-end device both VoLTE and VoWiFi are supported.

Unfortunately, when it comes to call quality the Edge+ performed even worse than the already questionable and mediocre Motorola Edge. Our conversational partners sounded very distant, and we could not help but notice substantial amounts of ambient noise. In addition, the Edge+’s microphone was not particularly sensitive to noise and only recorded when we raised our voice substantially. Otherwise, we were inaudible to our conversational partners on the other end of the line. The same basically applies to talking on speakerphone, with our conversational partners sounding somewhat clearer and better but our own voice continuing to require a certain level of volume and clarity in order to be recognized, recorded, and transmitted.

Cameras – Details out of focus

The main rear-facing camera array features a total of three lenses with the main camera offering a whopping 108 MP resolution. Since images this large are rarely ever required the camera uses 4x pixel binning to combine four pixels into one increasing light sensitivity significantly and resulting in images with a resolution of still fairly high 27 MP.

The main camera did very well in determining a decent white balance compromise. In comparison, photos taken with the OnePlus 8 Pro were noticeably cooler and those taken with the iPhone 11 Pro Max noticeably warmer. However, we found details and overall focus lacking, and other high-end smartphone cameras offered brighter and better exposed photos rich in detail in low-light conditions.

Zooming is supported in 0.1x steps, although ideal lighting conditions are required to make use of all three lenses. Otherwise, the camera software falls back on the main high-resolution camera’s digital zoom. In manual mode you get to actively select your lens of choice.

The ultra-wide-angle lens offers a 16 MP resolution, and its photos were somewhat dark when compared to other high-end smartphone cameras but offered an overall comparable level of detail. The 8 MP telephoto lens performed very well, particularly in extreme close-up macro situations.

Videos are recoded in 6K at 30 FPS or 1080p at 60 FPS. Both, the ultra-wide-angle and the telephoto lens only support up to 1080p at 30 FPS. The camera’s autofocus worked fast and reliable, as did the optical image stabilizer. Adjustments to sudden changes in light were performed fast and very subtle.

At the front, we find a 25 MP camera that could have offered higher details and more focus. In return, exposure was decent, and objects remained recognizable even in low light situations.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Even under ideal lighting conditions we did not grow fond of the main camera’s representation of details. Contrast ratio was acceptable but varied significantly throughout the photo. Colors were too pale overall.

Details deteriorated even further in low light, and illumination was mediocre.

Accessories and Warranty – Affordable Optional Power Supply

Inside the box we find a fast charger, a SIM tool, and a USB cable. The power supply is comparatively affordable and can be purchased retroactively for around $20, including cable.

Scope and length of warranty depends on country of purchase; our review unit came with a 24 months limited warranty.

Input Devices and Handling – Versatile Gesture Control

The Motorola Edge+’s touchscreen was very accurate all the way to its edges, and the 90 Hz display improved subjective smoothness and responsiveness quite significantly. The system reacted very quickly to our inputs, and scrolling was buttery smooth.

A fingerprint reader is hidden behind the display. It is located fairly far down, which takes quite some getting used to. It worked very fast and reliably.

As expected of Motorola there are several gestures and other ways of intelligent input to control the device. For example, you can flip the smartphone over in order to mute it or press and hold the volume rocker to skip forward or backwards through songs.

If desired, you can even enable a small menu offering various quick actions that can be accessed by touching the right display edge.

Display – Low Brightness for the Edge Plus

Its widened 19.5:9 FHD resolution is at the lower end of what is still acceptable for high-end smartphones. Given a smartphone display’s small size details remained crisp and fine, nevertheless. The AMOLED display supports HDR and feels very smooth thanks to its 90 Hz refresh rate.

We already noted a fairly dim maximum brightness when reviewing the Motorola Edge, and while the Edge+ offers more it also does play in a very different and more challenging league. Consequently, its average of 582 nits was barely good enough for second to last place.

Thanks to AMOLED technology the display offers true blacks, and thus an infinite contrast ratio on paper. In our reviews with a spectrophotometer and the CalMAN software we noticed a very minor blue tint and very accurate overall colors. And while all other high-end smartphones we compared the Edge+ to offered an even better color accuracy the difference was invisible to the naked eye.

Like all OLED panels the display uses PWM for brightness regulation, in this particular case at a frequency of 328.9 Hz. While fairly high we would still suggest trying it out before committing to it if you are known to be sensitive to display flicker.

Response times are short, a quality gamers will rejoice at.

Outdoor usability is limited due to its low maximum brightness, and the display is rendered unreadable in direct sunlight. Viewing angles are very good, and the image remains undistorted even at extremely acute angles.

Performance – Plenty of Power

At the time of writing, the Motorola Edge+ featured the second-fastest Qualcomm SoC available. The Snapdragon 865 offers 8 processor cores in three clusters running at up to 2.84 GHz, and it allowed the smartphone to not only score very high in our performance benchmarks but to also offer a very good overall system performance.

Looking at graphics performance we find the Motorola Edge+ to be at the top as well, which makes the device one of the fastest smartphones available at the time of writing.

Everyday snappiness benefited immensely not just from the smartphone’s high level of performance but also its 90 Hz display, which increased subjective performance and smoothness even further.

When browsing the web, the device secured a top spot as well. Scrolling and loading images was buttery smooth, and complex web pages loaded quickly and without noticeable delay.

The Edge+’s fast UFS 3.0 storage performed at a level comparable to its competitors and offered fast access and short application load times.

Gaming – 60 FPS, Anyone?

High-end smartphones are more than just workhorses; they have to be gaming-capable as well, and the Motorola Edge+ delivers exceptionally well in this regard. In both, Asphalt 9 as well as PUBG Mobile, it managed to achieve framerates north of 60 FPS in high details with PUBG dropping to a still smooth 40 FPS in the highest possible details. Framerates were determined using GameBench.

Game controls via touchscreen and gyroscope worked well. That said whether or not you like the fact that on-screen buttons are at the bottom behind the curved part of the glass is a matter of taste.

Emissions – Slower under Load

Temperature

Under sustained load temperatures rose to 44.9 °C, which is far from critical but can get uncomfortable on hot days. Sustained low-load use resulted in barely noticeable temperature increases.

According to GFXBench’s battery test the Motorola Edge+ had trouble maintaining its high level of performance under sustained load, and performance dropped by more than 20 % fairly quickly.

Speakers

There is a total of two speakers on the device. One at the bottom edge, the other doubles as earphone. This setup is basically identical to the more affordable Motorola Edge. However, the more expensive Edge+ offers a more linear representation of mids and highs and more pronounced deep mids making for a warmer soundscape. Voices remained distant, and the speakers were overwhelmed with epic movie scenes. Pop music sounded okay, classical music lacked differentiation between the various individual instruments.

All things considered the speakers are okay but certainly not the best in the realm of high-end smartphones. Using either Bluetooth or the 3.5-mm headphone jack will result in much clearer and better audio.

Battery life – Long-term Use

Power Consumption

While there are significantly more energy-efficient smartphones than the Motorola Edge+ the opposite is also true, and the device thus ended up somewhere in the middle. Only under load did it consume more energy than other high-end smartphones.

Battery Life

Thanks to its 5,000 mAh battery the Edge+ was able to secure first place when it comes to raw battery capacity, and it lasted for 15:45 hours in our Wi-Fi test – first place among its competitors. It should easily last a full two workdays of browsing the web without needing to be recharged. Even if Apple’s iPhone 11 Pro Max managed to outrun the Edge+ in some scenarios overall battery life was still excellent.

There is, however, one downside. The included 18 W fast charger takes more than two hours to fully charge the device. Compare that to the significantly faster 30 W charger that the OnePlus 8 Pro comes with. Not only does it take shorter to fully charge the battery, it will also take much less time to achieve at least a few extra hours of battery life.

Wireless charging with up to 15 W is also supported, and honestly also expected of expensive smartphones.

Verdict – How well did it do?

If you charge more than $1,000 for a smartphone you have to deliver. Unfortunately, the Motorola Edge+ fails to do just that in too many areas. The camera offers a high resolution, but details lack focus and the main lens performed mediocre at best in low light. The case is stylish and modern but can be depressed and is not waterproof.

Charging is another area where its competitors offer more bang for the buck, call quality should have been better, and the speakers are not among the best of what high-end smartphones had to offer at the time of writing. The display is not as bright and color-accurate as it is on other smartphones in the Edge+’s price range, and the device tends to thermal throttle under sustained load.

Granted, its edgeless display and stylish backside make the Motorola Edge+ stand out to a certain degree, location services work great once location lock has been obtained, and Motorola pulled out all the stops regarding wireless communication, from 5G to Wi-Fi 6 to Bluetooth 5.1.

The Edge+ signifies Motorola’s return to the realm of high-end smartphones. Unfortunately, the device fails to justify its high asking price.

If you are looking for a smartphone with 3.5-mm headphone jack you will be happy to hear that Motorola continues to support the analog audio output. Another benefit is its pure and clean rendition of Android including somewhat up-to-date security patches.

The Motorola Edge+ may not be the high-end smartphone with the best price-performance ratio, particularly considering more affordable alternatives such as the OnePlus 8 Pro or the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro. However, it manages to offer a very high level of performance, a unique design, and very good battery life.

AMD’s Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX is one heck of a chip. It recently found itself atop PassMark’s leaderboard (as spotted via @TUM_APISAK), leaving heavy hitters, such as the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and EPYC 7702, in the rear view mirror. That makes it all the more exciting that this powerhouse CPU has landed in a new system. But who can actually afford it? 

Debuted back in July, the Threadripper Pro series builds upon the success of the Ryzen Threadripper 3000-series (codename Castle Peak), while also borrowing a page out of the EPYC 7002-series’ (codename Rome) playbook. The Zen 2 Threadripper Pro processors slot into WRX80 motherboards that are armed with the sWRX8 CPU socket.

Essentially, the Pro models share the same core counts as their non-Pro counterparts, albeit at slightly lower clock speeds. AMD has locked the multipliers on the Pro variants, so there’s no way to overclock them either. Similar to EPYC offerings, the Threadripper Pro chips support eight memory channels to support up to 2TB of DDR4-3200 RAM and deliver up to 128 PCIe 4.0 lanes.

But the Threadripper Pro won’t be available on the retail market. The 7nm processors target OEM and system integrators (SI). Lenovo’s ThinkStation P620 is one of the first systems to feature the Threadripper Pro 3995WX. Spotted by hardware sleuth @momomo_us, the ThinkStation P620 (30E0004MUS) is up for purchase at Bottom Line Telecommunications with a soul-crushing price tag of $18,090.39. But that’s apparently a bargain; the suggested retail price for the ThinkStation P620 is $19,559.00, according to the retailer.

With its 64 CPU cores and 128 threads, the Threadripper Pro 3995WX inside the Lenovo system is the flagship SKU of the Threadripper Pro family. It runs with a 2.7 GHz base clock and 4.3 GHz boost clock, only 100 MHz lower than the Threadripper 3990X that it just crushed in PassMark. The Threadripper Pro 3995WX scored 88,675 CPU marks over the Threadripper 3990X’s 79,746, meaning the Pro variant is up to 11.2% faster.

Now it’s easier to see why the ThinkStation P620 costs what it costs. In addition to the Threadripper Pro 3995WX, the listed model comes equipped with 128GB of DDR4-3200 ECC memory and a pair of Nvidia’s Quadro RTX 6000 GPUs binded together through NVLink. The system’s storage is a bit underwhelming though since it only has a single 1TB M.2 PCIe 4.0 SSD installed. However, the ThinkStation P620 does provide a 10G Gigabit Ethernet port.

The aforementioned model is just one of 48 possible configurations that Bottom Line Telecommunications. The entry-level ThinkStation P620 (30E0003LUS) starts at $2,058.88 and comes equipped with the 12-core Threadripper Pro 3945WX, 16GB of RAM and the 1TB SSD. Bottom Line Telecommunications doesn’t list the graphics card inside this model.

A Twitter post by a French politician inadvertently revealed details about SiPearl’s upcoming high-performance processor powered by Arm’s Neoverse Zeus cores. 

The SiPearl Rhea system-on-chip will be used for an experimental ‘towards exascale’ supercomputer platform, with Rhea’s successor, SiPearl’s Cronos, used for the first European exascale supercomputer. 

The SiPearl Rhea SoC is based on 72 Arm Neoverse Zeus cores and to that end will be able compete against Amazon’s Graviton 2 and Ampere’s Altra processors. The processor also features 68 mesh network L3 cache slices along with various IP blocks. Frequencies of the SoC as well as cache sizes are unclear. 

European supercomputer chip

One of the particularly interesting features of SiPearl’s Rhea is its memory subsystem that relies on four HBM2E stacks that promise to offer a very high memory bandwidth as well as four or six DDR5 SDRAM controllers for extra memory capacity. Since the chip uses 72 cores, it needs a lot of RAM, so usage of a hybrid memory subsystem is justified. 

Today’s most powerful supercomputer — Fugaku — is based on Fujitsu’s custom 48-core A64FX processor (based on the ARMv8.2-A architecture) that also uses HBM2 memory, but does not use more traditional DDR4. 

The SoC is set to be made using TSMC’s N7 manufacturing technology, according to the Twitter post, but earlier SiPearl indicated that it will use TSMC’s N6 fabrication process that uses extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography. 

SiPeark expects to launch its Rhea processors sometimes in 2021 and use them to build an experimental pre-ExaFLOPS-class machine. An even more advanced family of SoCs named Cronos is set to emerge in 2022 or 2023 and they will power exascacle supercomputers developed in Europe.

A photograph showing an engineering sample of the alleged RDNA2 graphics card has been published online.

Is this Big Navi?

A picture of a mysterious engineering sample has emerged on Bilibili. It is not possible to determine which graphics processor does the graphics card has, but one could guess this might be one of the upcoming Big Navi variants (or any other NAVI 2x family processor at this point). The timing for this leak is definitely interesting.

Some labels have been attached to the board, such as ‘Typical Samsung 16Gb‘ indicating the memory type used for this board. This means that each module is 2GB. The leaker claims that the card has 3+3+2 modules (8 in total). This would imply this model has a 256-bit memory interface.

Another label says ‘Full ???? Typical XT A0 ASIC’. The XT variants are usually reserved for the Radeon RX series, meaning that this should be a sample of a gaming card, not a Radeon Pro.

The board is covered in dip switches and various voltage measurement points, it is indeed far from a retail product. There is even a huge CPU-type cooler is attached to the graphics processor. To the left, we can also see LED load indicators and at least two power connectors (one being 8-pin).

AMD today announced that it will host a Radeon RX 6000 event on October 28th. The company promised to reveal more information on the next-generation RDNA2 graphics cards. The manufacturer did not confirm the launch date yet, but the series should be expected to officially debut in November.